break;
case 2:
prio = THREAD_PRIORITY_LOWEST;
+ break;
case 3:
case 4:
prio = THREAD_PRIORITY_BELOW_NORMAL;
2003-10-18 Marc Kleine-Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* kaffe/kaffevm/systems/win32/winthread.c
(jthread_setpriority)
added missing break statement in switch-case
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:30:46AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> I've found a nice copy'n'paste bug in configure.in
> AC_ARG_ENABLE(jvmpi,[ --enable-jvmpi Enable JVMPI
> that doesn't fit together
crap, I sent the corrected codeline, this is the o
Hi!
I've found a nice copy'n'paste bug in configure.in
AC_ARG_ENABLE(jvmpi,[ --enable-jvmpi Enable JVMPI
that doesn't fit together
regards - Marc
P.S.: release tarball is compiling on PPC (native),
make check is still running, but looks good :)
--
#!/bin/sh
set - `type $0` 't
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 01:09:39AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> I've attached a patch for the interpreter that should fix this issue for
> gcc-compiled interpreter on all platforms. It works for me on mips-irix and
> i386-linux interpreters.
> could you give it a try on m68k and powerpc?
It wor
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 10:01:49AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> it seems that divjava fails because long remainder is broken on powerpc-linux.
> Could you try out the following C program, and report back what it prints out:
>
> #include
> #include
> #define T long
> #ifndef LONG_MIN
> # define
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 08:21:00AM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> nice! thanks for testing.
> Could you take a look at the divtest.java issue? diff divtest.fail vs.
> divtest.out and try to reduce code in divtest.java to as few lines as possible
> that trigger the bug.
It's '0x8000 % -1' tha
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:32:04PM -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> thanks for the bug report and the patch, I've used some code from quakeforge
> that hopefully deals with the problem with some autotools magic and a few
> ifdefs. Could you check out the latest souces, and give it a try?
it works!
r
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:01:35PM +0200, Helmer Kr?mer wrote:
> sorry for the delay.
doesn't matter, _some_ parts of germany were on yesterday holiday, have
you been? :)
> Kaffe. The error has already been fixed in cvs, though:
damn, haven't check CVSare there plans to make a 1.1.0a ve
Hi!
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:45:01PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> gcc-3.2 goes as far as the 2.95
> > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc-2.95 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
> > -I../../config -I../../include
> > -I../../kaffe/kaffevm/systems/unix-jthreads -Ii
Hi!
addition:
gcc-3.2 goes as far as the 2.95
$ gcc-3.2 --version
gcc-3.2 (GCC) 3.2.3 20030415 (Debian prerelease)
> than I switched back to gcc-2.95, after make distclean and configure it
> goes till:
>
> $ gcc-2.95 -v
> gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
>
> /bin/sh ../../libto
Hi list!
I just tried to compile kaffe-1.1.0 (from website) on my ppc (ibook G3) box running
debian testing (upgraded this morning). I encountered some errors:
After the usual ./configure, make keep going until this:
if /bin/sh ../../../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DINTERPRETER
-DKVER=\"1.1.0\
Hi Dalibor,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 09:22:46AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> looking forward to your patch & changelog entries,
> dalibor topic
Both patch and changelog are attached. BTW what is the appropriate way
to submit changelog entries?
regards Marc
Index: kaffe//kaffevm/jit/machine.c
===
Hi!
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:43:48PM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > > > Okay. Remeber never mix gc_* and K* calls. But
I've search for gc_free()s and found:
$KAFFE/kaffe/kaffevm/machine.c:479 codeblock gc_free()ed
$KAFFE/kaffe/kaffevm/machine.c:602 codeblcok KMALLOC()ed
within the jit3, codeb
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 06:05:39AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Okay. Remeber never mix gc_* and K* calls. But if
> > you have a look at the
> > CVS-sources $KAFFE/libraries/clib/native/ZipFile.c
> > lines 26-36. The mem
> > for the str is alloced via KMALLOC, but later freed
> > with gc_free. I
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:29:43AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> --- Marc Kleine-Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My assumption is that KFREE clears the mem at once,
> > and gc_free marks
> > the mem to be freed by the garbage collect
Hi!
I'm currently diggin' though kaffe's internals. What is the difference
between KFREE and gc_free?
My assumption is that KFREE clears the mem at once, and gc_free marks
the mem to be freed by the garbage collector? Am I right?
In which situation should one preference which method?
regards -
Hi *!
In the file include/Makefile.am (and the derived Makefile.in, Makefile)
What is the difference between the various *_HDRS (INSTALL_DERIVED_HDRS,
NOINSTALL_DERIVED_HDRS, ...)? Why is a header file in a certain _HDRS
group, what are the requuirements for the header files and the groups?
I ho
Hi!
Just a teeny-weeny patch, that cvs ignores the org_*.h files in the
include dir.
regards - Marc
cvs-ignore.patch.bz2
Description: Binary data
Hi!
I tried to kompile the latest CVS version of Kaffe on Mac OSX.2.3 +
Dec202 Developer Tools + newest fink binary distribution.
after the usual configure
[path-to-cvs]/configure --prefix=/Users/frogger/kaffe-cvs --enable-debug
--without-x --disable-sound
...and make, kaffeh works fine til
19 matches
Mail list logo
