On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Kiyo Inaba wrote:
> Riccardo wrotes:
> But, the real concern for me is which version of environment we can
> support. In general, if we make more CPU/OS (with different versions)
> supported, the usefulness of kaffe becomes bigger, but of course we
> need not to be so strong-h
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Salut Gerard, Hallo Helmer,
>
> SP_OFFSET is used to denote the stack pointer offset, AFAIK.
>
> Looking at the GNU Libc sources, I see two different values of stack
> offsets, 8 without a FPU and 20 with a FPU. It seems as if we need to
> differentiate
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Timothy Stack wrote:
> >
> > I am part of a team porting Kaffe to a Cray. I would like to find someone
> > who has an understanding of why the locks were implemented with hidden stack
> > variable (the "where" in _lockMutex). It is causing great consternation in
> > light of
uOn Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jim Pick wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:03:45 +0200
> "Markus Maier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please make the installation of kaffe moveable;
> > i.e. don't use a fixed "prefix" variable in the wrapper
> > scirpts, but calculate its value in some way.
>
> I
