Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Thanks for the fix! Could you take a look if the same patch applied to
unix-pthreads, as well?
Done. However, still with unix-jthreads, I have now the following problem
when running make check, i.e.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kaffe.wip
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Thanks for the fix! Could you take a look if the same patch applied to
> unix-pthreads, as well?
Done. However, still with unix-jthreads, I have now the following problem
when running make check, i.e.:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kaffe.wip]$ $JAVA at.dms.kjc.Ma
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> I have now the following problem when running make check, i.e.:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] kaffe.wip]$ $JAVA at.dms.kjc.Main
Note that I could fully rebuildLib @essential.files et al. And the
following failure is happening when invoking the java compil
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Where should I look at?
>
> I'd look at replacing the sigcontext stuff (SIGNAL_ARGS,
> sigcontextinfo.h etc.) in config/x86_64 with ucontext, that was one
> thing I was unsure of, and Guilhem had a different opinion ;)
That's what I did too, after h
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hmm, you use attribute unused, which gcc really interprets it as unused
nowadays, this optimizing out the load, hence the test.
I will commit a 64-bit fix shortly, the guessPointer was truncated. ;-)
Thanks for the fix! Coul
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Hmm, you use attribute unused, which gcc really interprets it as unused
> nowadays, this optimizing out the load, hence the test.
I will commit a 64-bit fix shortly, the guessPointer was truncated. ;-)
_
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> > Latest version that fully built and fully regtested was 1.1.4. Looking at
> > the changes...
>
> Thanks a lot for taking your time to look at them.
Well, I had to reschedule it up to this morning as higher priority items
came in the "dichotomy" proce
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
since I don't have access to x86_64 atm, could you give it a spin?
It's hanging at:
Compiling classes from @essential.files using
/home/gb/cvs/kaffe.wip/kaffe/kaffe/kaffe-bin -ss 500k -mx 256M at.dms.kjc.Main
Latest version that fully built and fully regtested w
Hi,
> since I don't have access to x86_64 atm, could you give it a spin?
It's hanging at:
Compiling classes from @essential.files using
/home/gb/cvs/kaffe.wip/kaffe/kaffe/kaffe-bin -ss 500k -mx 256M at.dms.kjc.Main
Latest version that fully built and fully regtested was 1.1.4. Looking at
th
Kaffe CVS wrote:
PatchSet 4899
Date: 2004/07/06 20:48:32
Author: dalibor
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
Fixed build on x86_64-linux
2004-07-06 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* config/x86_64/linux/sigcontextinfo.h: Cleaned up.
(GET_PC, GET_STACK, GET_FRAME) Use fields from sig
PatchSet 4899
Date: 2004/07/06 20:48:32
Author: dalibor
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
Fixed build on x86_64-linux
2004-07-06 Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* config/x86_64/linux/sigcontextinfo.h: Cleaned up.
(GET_PC, GET_STACK, GET_FRAME) Use fields from sigcontext.
11 matches
Mail list logo
