> No problem.
>
> You have defined a jitCodeHeader structure in jit3/machine.h.
> This structure is not defined in jit/machine.h though it is used by
> stackTrace.c because JIT is also a TRANSLATOR ;) .
Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't catch that it was a jit1 vs. jit3 issue. I was
just thinking it was
Timothy Stack wrote:
Hi Tim,
Your patch is great but you have forgotten the code compatibility with
JIT for jitCodeHeader.
I think it is simple to adapt but could you do it ? It breaks the
compilation on platforms which
only supports JIT.
I don't understand the problem... Do you have some o
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> Your patch is great but you have forgotten the code compatibility with
> JIT for jitCodeHeader.
> I think it is simple to adapt but could you do it ? It breaks the
> compilation on platforms which
> only supports JIT.
I don't understand the problem... Do you have some output I
Hi Tim,
Your patch is great but you have forgotten the code compatibility with
JIT for jitCodeHeader.
I think it is simple to adapt but could you do it ? It breaks the
compilation on platforms which
only supports JIT.
Thanks a lot,
Regards,
Guilhem Lavaux.
___
PatchSet 5686
Date: 2004/12/21 00:15:25
Author: stack
Branch: HEAD
Tag: (none)
Log:
Checkpoint of jitter for linux/ppc. It still doesn't fully work, but
it passes the internal tests and you can run HelloWorld if it is in
the BOOTCLASSPATH. Exception handling and many other things are a
joke and