hi Greg,
--- Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also had to add java/io/CharArrayWriter to
> essential.files to get
> it to build the javalib.
I used jikes, so I didn't notice that.
> Then I stopped it by pressing Ctrl-C in the window
> where I had started
> it. I don't know if thi
Dalibor Topic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've created a patch (which needed to consider that we
> can't start counting stack traces right away, as long
> as the system properties are not initialized, the
> PrintWriter class initializer will fail), it's
> attached.
I also had to add java/io/Char
hi Greg,
--- Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dalibor Topic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It looks like I'll need the patch. My attempt to
> add this code
> caused kaffe to dump core immediately.
I've created a patch (which needed to consider that we
can't start counting stack traces r
Dalibor Topic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Could you inject the ObjectCounter code into the
> java.util.HashMap class, add a call to it in the
> HashMap Entry constructor and add a call to print out
> the trace cache in Runtime.exit()? I am really
> interested who is allocating all these little th
hi Greg,
--- Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dalibor Topic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I started up Freenet with those switches (without my
> normal -mx 224M)
> and then beat upon it vigorously with local
> requests.
thanks for the data. I've looked through it, and there
is a ton of
Dalibor Topic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Could you rebuild kaffe with debugging enabled, and
> run it with
>
> kaffe -vmdebug GCSTAT,GCDIAG -verbosegc -verbosemem
> your-class 2>gc-stats.txt
http://wooledge.org/~greg/gc-stats.txt.bz2 (83kB)
I started up Freenet with those switches (without m
hi Greg,
thanks for the long and interesting reply.
--- Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dalibor Topic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> was removed from CVS recently, I no longer get that
> particular one;
> but I'm still getting this one occasionally:
>
> assertion "!INTS_DISABLED()" fai
Dalibor Topic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I assume that the Freenet developers lurking on this
> mailing have some experience with respect to
> scalability of kaffe on their platforms, as they use
> kaffe with
> a) tons of threads
> b) to run crypto code
> c) lots of network activity
> Matthew,
Hi xiefei,
--- xie fei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the two results, kaffe's performance is
> not good as IBMJava2-131, while its network
> scalability is better.
It would be interesting to see a profile trace of
kaffe running VolanoMark for possible optimizations.
Could you run Vol
I have downloaded kaffe and IBMJava2-131 Java VIrtual machine from the website. And install the run them under Linux Redhat 7.3. When I use the benchmark VolanoBenchmark and VolanoChat to test the performance and network scalability of them, I get the result as follow:
Performance: Kaffe
VolanoMa
10 matches
Mail list logo
