Re: [kaffe] Freeing jit temp data on demand (Was: Re: JavaLayer 0.3.0

2003-09-20 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Tim, thanks for taking the time to look into this. I've tried backing out the change as you propose, and it works for me (TM). But the jit-temp-data is no longer freed, so we are back at square one ;( Timothy Stack wrote: Okie, I've duplicated the problem, the gc is getting stuck and that

Re: [kaffe] Freeing jit temp data on demand (Was: Re: JavaLayer 0.3.0

2003-09-19 Thread Timothy Stack
hi, now the jit frees its temp data, but I don't hear a sound anymore and the cpu usage is at ninety-something percent ;) when I run kaffe with -verbosecall and pipe the output to a file, I can hear some sound, but it skips. Weird. Could you take a third look at the code?

Re: [kaffe] Freeing jit temp data on demand (Was: Re: JavaLayer 0.3.0 works)

2003-09-18 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Tim, it's getting better but it's not perfect yet ;) now the jit frees its temp data, but I don't hear a sound anymore and the cpu usage is at ninety-something percent ;) when I run kaffe with -verbosecall and pipe the output to a file, I can hear some sound, but it skips. Weird. Could you

Re: [kaffe] Freeing jit temp data on demand (Was: Re: JavaLayer 0.3.0

2003-09-18 Thread Timothy Stack
Hi Tim, it's getting better but it's not perfect yet ;) bah, i suck now the jit frees its temp data, but I don't hear a sound anymore and the cpu usage is at ninety-something percent ;) when I run kaffe with -verbosecall and pipe the output to a file, I can hear some sound, but it

Re: [kaffe] Freeing jit temp data on demand (Was: Re: JavaLayer 0.3.0 works)

2003-09-17 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Tim, thanks for the quick patch! I tried it, but unfortunately, now kaffe crashes when I try to play a mp3. bash-2.05a$ kaffe -cp jl030.jar javazoom.jl.player.jlp /var/tmp/GutenRMX.mp3 playing /var/tmp/GutenRMX.mp3... kaffe-bin: ../../../../kaffe/kaffe/kaffevm/jit3/machine.c:221: translate:

Re: [kaffe] Freeing jit temp data on demand (Was: Re: JavaLayer 0.3.0 works)

2003-09-16 Thread Timothy Stack
Timothy Stack wrote: Hi, The memory usage seems to come from jit-temp-data: Nr179 Mem 8980K, which doesn't get freed as it should be, so it's impossible to run with less then -mx 16M. I think the gc should try to free jit temp data when it runs out of memory. Tim, Helmer,