Ciao Gerlando,
--- Gerlando Falauto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it's perfectly clear but still I don't get your point. If you wanna
be safe, shouldn't you just be CONSISTENT? Declare it as a float, and let
the compiler decide what casts are appropriate. At this level, so long as
I get
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Ciao Gerlando,
--- Gerlando Falauto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it's perfectly clear but still I don't get your point. If you wanna
be safe, shouldn't you just be CONSISTENT? Declare it as a float, and let
the compiler decide what casts are
Hi everyone,
hi,
(especially the JIT back-end coders)
does anyone have any idea why _slot_slot_fconst is declared
void _slot_slot_fconst(SlotInfo*, SlotInfo*, double, ifunc, int)
^^
shouldn't there be a float instead?
Can you update
Ciao Gerlando,
--- Gerlando Falauto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Dalibor Topic wrote:
--- Gerlando Falauto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The C99 standard doesn't guarantee you'll have 32 bit wide floats. It
doesn't
even guarantee the floats will be 'base 2'. But fortunately,
Hi everyone,
(especially the JIT back-end coders)
does anyone have any idea why _slot_slot_fconst is declared
void _slot_slot_fconst(SlotInfo*, SlotInfo*, double, ifunc, int)
^^
shouldn't there be a float instead?
I took a quick look at the
Hi Gerlando,
void _slot_slot_fconst(SlotInfo*, SlotInfo*, double, ifunc, int)
shouldn't there be a float instead?
I am hesitate to reply for this, but if old story is still true, any
c function arguments are converted to double from float. See, pp.137
of C a reference manual.
# There should be
On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 04:54 AM, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
Hi everyone,
hi,
(especially the JIT back-end coders)
does anyone have any idea why _slot_slot_fconst is declared
void _slot_slot_fconst(SlotInfo*, SlotInfo*, double, ifunc, int)
^^
Don't have that manual at hand, but I think that very much depends on the
compiler and/or the runtime architecture. I can assure you my (old, ugly,
buggy, horrible, non-standard, fp-less, whatever) compiler and
You could consider using a better compiler ;)
You wanna write one? ;-) Be my
