Re: [kaffe] Re: GNU classpath and AWT

2003-09-03 Thread Chris Gray
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 19:58, Tom Tromey wrote: > > "James" == James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ some old email... ] > > James> BTW does classpath have sponsors and are people actually > James> employeed to work on classpath. > > There are some people here at Red Hat who w

[kaffe] Re: GNU classpath and AWT

2003-09-03 Thread Tom Tromey
> "James" == James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [ some old email... ] James> BTW does classpath have sponsors and are people actually James> employeed to work on classpath. There are some people here at Red Hat who work on gcj; we end up doing a fair amount of work on classpath as a s

Re: [kaffe] Re: GNU classpath and AWT

2003-08-14 Thread Jim Pick
On 14 Aug 2003 12:28:33 -0600 "Tom Tromey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "James" == James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > James> Yes. Actually there is alot ot work on. I like to see > James> multimedia truly supported in Kaffe. > > Let me make a plea for new packages and such to be

[kaffe] Re: GNU classpath and AWT

2003-08-14 Thread James Simmons
> James> Yes. Actually there is alot ot work on. I like to see > James> multimedia truly supported in Kaffe. > > Let me make a plea for new packages and such to be written in > Classpath, not kaffe. > > My belief is that there aren't enough free software java hackers for > us to spend time rewri

[kaffe] Re: GNU classpath and AWT

2003-08-14 Thread Tom Tromey
> "James" == James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: James> Yes. Actually there is alot ot work on. I like to see James> multimedia truly supported in Kaffe. Let me make a plea for new packages and such to be written in Classpath, not kaffe. My belief is that there aren't enough free softw