Hi,
> ":" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> There is only one functional change left between kaffe and classpath in
:> computeFields():
:> -fields[DAY_OF_WEEK_IN_MONTH] = (fields[DAY_OF_MONTH] + 12) / 7;
:> +fields[DAY_OF_WEEK_IN_MONTH] = (fields[DAY_OF_MONTH] + 6) / 7;
Hi,
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 20:15, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> after the discussion on the Classpath mailing list, I'd say it looks good ;)
>
> Mark, can I check it into Classpath's CVS with an updated ChangeLog entry?
I'll check this in while I am resyncing with kaffe.
There is only one functional cha
Hi Ito,
after the discussion on the Classpath mailing list, I'd say it looks good ;)
Mark, can I check it into Classpath's CVS with an updated ChangeLog entry?
2003-11-29 Guilhem Lavaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* java/util/GregorianCalendar.java (computeTime):
12:00 midnight is AM a
Hi,
> ":" == Stephen Crawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> If Sun's implementation (you don't say which JDK version!) is failing
:> a test, then that casts serious doubt on the correctness of the mauve
:> testcase itself!
I mentioned the JDK version as Sun's java version "1.4.2_02"
before s
On Friday 28 November 2003 15:43, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> In the long run, the JDK is as irrelevant as an industry standard as SCO
> Unix is now. Ten years ago, there were many (closed source)
> implementations of Unix-ish OSes. GNU/Linux is gradually replacing them.
>
> I boldly predict that the s
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Crawley wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A mauve test attached. Since I have got a write access to the mauve
CVS registry, I will add it to the registry. The test results shows
that Sun's implementation also seems to have something wrong.
If Sun's implementation (you don't
Hi,
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 04:39, Stephen Crawley wrote:
> Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 02:03, Stephen Crawley wrote:
> > > The over-arching principle for Mauve testcases is that the behavior of
> > > Sun's Java implementations is the "gold standard" for confor
Stephen Crawley writes:
>
> I don't understand what you are saying here. We are not building Mauve
> tests in order to validate Sun's implementation. Rather, we are
> building it to check that other implementations (including Classpath)
> conform to the accepted specification for Java. The
Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 02:03, Stephen Crawley wrote:
> > The over-arching principle for Mauve testcases is that the behavior of
> > Sun's Java implementations is the "gold standard" for conformance
> > testing.
>
> I don't agree. We should not create Mauv
Hi,
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 02:03, Stephen Crawley wrote:
> The over-arching principle for Mauve testcases is that the behavior of
> Sun's Java implementations is the "gold standard" for conformance
> testing.
I don't agree. We should not create Mauve tests to validate some
proprietary library impl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> A mauve test attached. Since I have got a write access to the mauve
> CVS registry, I will add it to the registry. The test results shows
> that Sun's implementation also seems to have something wrong.
If Sun's implementation (you don't say which JDK version!) is fail
Hi,
> ":" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> Looked some more at the code and I see now that the the first change was
:> inside a if (time >= gregorianCutover) so it now makes more sense to me.
:> And the second change seems correct given the above remark.
:> I'll commit it in Cl
Hi,
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 23:57, Ito Kazumitsu wrote:
>
> 2003-11-25 Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * java/util/GregorianCalendar.java (getLinearTime): Avoid counting
> the leap day of the leap year twice.
> (computeFields): First week of month is 1 not 0.
Thanks
> ":" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:> and to have a ChangeLog entry for this patch (Ito?).
How about this?
2003-11-25 Ito Kazumitsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* java/util/GregorianCalendar.java (getLinearTime): avoid counting
the leap day of the leap year twice.
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
Since I am not a GregorianCalendar expert I was hoping that someone
could review the following patch which I have in my tree from Ito
Kazumitsu. He and I wrote a couple of mauve test cases which are fixed
by this and I see no new failures. But people didn't seem to be
com
15 matches
Mail list logo