[kaffe] Re: Makefile for java.nio

2003-05-29 Thread Daniel Bonniot
Actually, it might not be that the classes are missing. It is that the compiler (kjc) finds errors in them (so they probably get ignored after that). Although I'm not sure, because there are both java.nio.*Impl and gnu.java.nio.*Impl. There might be two separate issues. Or could it be a kjc

[kaffe] Re: Makefile for java.nio

2003-05-29 Thread Daniel Bonniot
The build also fails with jikes: Found 11 semantic errors compiling gnu/java/nio/CharBufferImpl.java: 55. this.backing_buffer = new char [cap]; ^^ *** Semantic Error: The field backing_buffer in type java.nio.CharBuffer has default access and is not accessible

Re: [kaffe] Re: Makefile for java.nio

2003-05-29 Thread Dalibor Topic
Salut Daniel, --- Daniel Bonniot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The build also fails with jikes: Found 11 semantic errors compiling gnu/java/nio/CharBufferImpl.java: 55. this.backing_buffer = new char [cap]; ^^ *** Semantic Error: The field backing_buffer

Re: [kaffe] Re: Makefile for java.nio

2003-05-29 Thread Daniel Bonniot
I haven't tried it with jikes yet, but I've just checked in a fix that worked for me on kjc. Thanks, it works with jikes too. So I can now report that kaffe built correctly, and make check reports no error (only TestNative.java was SKIP'ed, is that normal?). Furthermore, it could by used to

Release freeze tomorrow? (Was: Re: [kaffe] Re: Makefile for java.nio)

2003-05-29 Thread Dalibor Topic
Salut Daniel, --- Daniel Bonniot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't tried it with jikes yet, but I've just checked in a fix that worked for me on kjc. Thanks, it works with jikes too. So I can now report that kaffe built correctly, and make check reports no error (only