>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 11:11:44AM -0600, Godmar Back wrote:
> > your subject says that Kaffe fails to compile, but your mail seems to
> > indicate it compiles, but doesn't run? I'm confused.
> > If it doesn't compile, you should post the error you're getting and
> > the configure options yo
On Apr 11, 1999, Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still libtool tries to link with ltdl.lo rather than with ltdl.o when
> I did not specify '--disable-shared'.
Yup, this is even documented in kaffe/FAQ/FAQ.libtool.
--with-staticvm and --with-staticlib are Kaffe-specific flags, that do
no
On Apr 11, 1999, Kiyo Inaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've also tested 1.0b4 on m68k/netbsd for shared libraries.
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
>-L/usr/local/lib -o Kaffe -export-dynamic main.o -dlopen
>../../libraries/clib/native/libnative.la -dlop
>
> On Apr 11, 1999, Godmar Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My experience is that is does not compile with egcs.
>
> Actually, it doesn't compile with a broken glibc that uses invalid asm
> statements in optimized macros for ANSI-C Standard functions. Older
> gcc's used to silently gener
On Apr 11, 1999, Godmar Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My experience is that is does not compile with egcs.
Actually, it doesn't compile with a broken glibc that uses invalid asm
statements in optimized macros for ANSI-C Standard functions. Older
gcc's used to silently generate bad code; egc
On Apr 11, 1999, Godmar Back <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to look at what became the final 1.0b4, but
> apparently a proposed change to increase the default stack size for
> the interpreter didn't make it in.
Indeed. However, I've tried to increase it on Solaris/sparc,
All,
Yeah the JIT is pretty slow - it's about 2 years old now and I haven't
tweeked it since doing the original version.
BUT!! Now the Beta 4 has been released I can say that Transvirtual hsa
been working on a new more optimized JIT which we'll be delivering into
the CVS tree as soon as we iron
On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 11:11:44AM -0600, Godmar Back wrote:
> your subject says that Kaffe fails to compile, but your mail seems to
> indicate it compiles, but doesn't run? I'm confused.
> If it doesn't compile, you should post the error you're getting and
> the configure options you used.
My f
Holger,
your subject says that Kaffe fails to compile, but your mail seems to
indicate it compiles, but doesn't run? I'm confused.
If it doesn't compile, you should post the error you're getting and
the configure options you used.
My experience is that is does not compile with egcs. Part of
Hi,
let me make a few random comments about this speed discussion.
First, let me point out what's needed: we need to complete the gcj
integration in order to precompile Kaffe's class libraries.
Now that both gcj+libgcj have been released, this has become even
more pressing. Anybody who wants
>>Do you *still* have to do it? I have fixed the libtool problem that
>>caused it to think it could create shared libraries when it did not
>>know how to do it, so if you update your CVS tree or get release
>>1.0b4, the problem should be fixed. Please let me know if this is not
>>the case.
>Sur
System:
Linux 2.2.3
glibc 2.0.7.19981211
egcs-1.1 (2.91.60)
The latest Kaffe 1.0.b4 fails to run on my Linux box. I tested
both the default thread implementation and with linux-threads.
When i compile with default threads kaffe hogs up all my CPU
time, when compiled with linux-threa
Artur Biesiadowski wrote:
>
> Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
>
> > I am confused by this results. Should I understand that under Linux, jdk
> > 1.1.7 is using a JIT ?!?!?
> > Or, the interpreter of jdk 1.1.7 is as fast as Kaffe JIT ?
>
> Basically yes, in many cases sun's interpreter is as fast a
Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
> I am confused by this results. Should I understand that under Linux, jdk
> 1.1.7 is using a JIT ?!?!?
> Or, the interpreter of jdk 1.1.7 is as fast as Kaffe JIT ?
Basically yes, in many cases sun's interpreter is as fast as kaffe
jitted code. Why kaffe jit is slow
Hello all,
I have downloaded today 1.0.b4 and tried it with my applications.
Very good work. All my SWING applications (including database access
through JDBC to PostgreSQL) worked fine.
Some small differences with fonts, but they run fine.
I wrote a small program in order to check kaffe's speed
15 matches
Mail list logo
