> I noticed that in kaffe lock implementation (in slowLockMutex()
> and slowUnlockMutex() ), the last thread suspending on the lock
> will always be resumed firstly, which doesn't embody equality
> policy. Right?
It is not the fairest policy. However, the JLS does not require a
fair locking p
Dear all,
I noticed that in kaffe lock implementation (in slowLockMutex()
and slowUnlockMutex() ), the last thread suspending on the lock
will always be resumed firstly, which doesn't embody equality
policy. Right?
Fang Wei Jian