On Jun 28, 2000, "Nic Ferrier" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused about TranV's position now... the Kaffe web site says
that no code contributed to Kaffe will be used by TransV. I don't see
why not... I certainly wouldn't have a problem with it - they're
supporting the GPL and I applaud
Tim Wilkinson writes:
Also, has anyone got a legal opinion of using the 1.2 spec from Sun to
write an independent implementation of the 1.2 additions?
McNealy's minor minions have one to offer:
If the judge were to rule against Sun, "that's not a disaster for us,
for the following
Duncan W. McQueen writes:
Is there any work or synchronization between Classpath and Kaffe? Are
Not really.
Are there things implemented in Classpath that aren't in Kaffe, and the
same in reverse?
Probably (I don't know what's currently implemented in Classpath).
You could argue that
But I am concerned with the GPL Kaffe. Is it unfeasible to attempt a
merge of what Classpath has done into Klasses.jar??
Duncan W. McQueen writes:
Is there any work or synchronization between Classpath and Kaffe?
Are
Not really.
Are there things implemented in Classpath that aren't in
Archie,
If you thinhk that scry you should see what Sun is saying in the Sun v. M$
in court.
Cheers
Tim
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
Tim Wilkinson writes:
Just to keep you informed, we just signed a customer who wants RMI
implemented so we'll be spending some time on the
