go consumer producer to support compression
-
Key: KAFKA-158
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-158
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
Components: clients
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129018#comment-13129018
]
Chris Burroughs commented on KAFKA-156:
---
This is more or less what we do with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129021#comment-13129021
]
Neha Narkhede commented on KAFKA-156:
-
Chris,
We currently don't do this with any
On 10/14/2011 03:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
That's fine. What do others in the community think about this? Were
they counting on a release of Maven artifacts as well? If that's
what is everyone's understanding then the release should be good on
this front.
My expectation was that maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129024#comment-13129024
]
Chris Burroughs commented on KAFKA-156:
---
Sorry, wrong we. I meant this is what the
On 10/10/2011 11:08 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Oct 10, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
On 10/02/2011 12:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I assume that our first release will be 0.6. Is that correct?
Could someone close the old 0.6 jira milestone?
You and all the developers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129031#comment-13129031
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-156:
---
If we spool, when the broker comes back, should we deliver
Hi,
This is the fourth candidate for the first incubator release for
Apache Kafka, version 0.7.0-incubating.
There are *no* code changes since candidate 3. This candidate is
published to follow the updated release
process for Kafka.
It fixes the following issues:
On Oct 17, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
On 10/10/2011 11:08 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Oct 10, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
On 10/02/2011 12:16 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I assume that our first release will be 0.6. Is that correct?
Could someone close
Why would the project be stuck with it? The repository can always
berearranged, right?
Yeah, that was overlooked by me while creating the branch. We thought
that we will
just rearrange the repo after the vote to fix the /branches/0.7 path.
Thanks for the clarification Chris !
-Neha
On Mon,
I did get one test failure:
[info] Test Starting: testLoadBalance(kafka.zk.ZKLoadBalanceTest)
[error] Test Failed: testLoadBalance(kafka.zk.ZKLoadBalanceTest)
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:5 but was:2
[snip]
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129265#comment-13129265
]
Jay Kreps commented on KAFKA-156:
-
This would be a good feature to have. I think we will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129296#comment-13129296
]
Jay Kreps commented on KAFKA-156:
-
To clarify what I was saying, the single log would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129301#comment-13129301
]
Chris Burroughs commented on KAFKA-156:
---
Perhaps the producers themselves should just
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Why would the project be stuck with it? The repository can always be
rearranged, right?
That's not my understanding but I could be wrong. I do not agree with your
reply to Neha where you state the project can
On Oct 17, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Why would the project be stuck with it? The repository can always be
rearranged, right?
That's not my understanding but I could be wrong. I do not agree with your
Php Client support for compression attribute
Key: KAFKA-159
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-159
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
Components: clients
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aaron Raddon updated KAFKA-159:
---
Attachment: phpclient_newmessagecompression.patch
Not entirely sure about this but it allowed the
18 matches
Mail list logo
