On 12/03/2011 02:40 PM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
> My reading is that since we would only be distributing source code, the
> NOTICE file should not reflect binary dependencies and would have *only*
> the standard Apache bit [3]. Same for LICENSE.
I suppose any jar's checked into svn would complicat
It was suggested on general@ that a source only release reduces the
number of requirements with regards to dealing with (transitive)
dependencies and NOTICE files [1]. I can't recall if this is new or not
but the release guide also currently suggests them for early projects [2].
My reading is tha
Great work!
Having a solid doc/spec for the wire protocol would also likely decrease
the need to have as many clients in-tree. I think at this point that
would be a good thing.
On 11/23/2011 06:32 PM, David Ormsbee wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Inspired by the Wire Format wiki entry, I recently create
