ether some guidelines on
> >> what he does and we can try to emulate.
> >>
> >> -Jay
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Prashanth Menon <
> >> prashanth.men...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 from
ould just
>> require that everybody get Jun to review their patches. :-)
>>
>> Or, more practically, maybe Jun should put together some guidelines on
>> what he does and we can try to emulate.
>>
>> -Jay
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Prashant
n should put together some guidelines on
> what he does and we can try to emulate.
>
> -Jay
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Prashanth Menon <
> prashanth.men...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 from me on the maintainer system and having a primary/secondary for
>>
wrote:
> +1 from me on the maintainer system and having a primary/secondary for
> components.
>
> I also think we should try as much as possible to get at least two
> reviewers for patches that come in. This is something I'm very guilty of
> and am trying to correct. I
+1 from me on the maintainer system and having a primary/secondary for
components.
I also think we should try as much as possible to get at least two
reviewers for patches that come in. This is something I'm very guilty of
and am trying to correct. I get the feeling Jun is overwhelmed
+1 on this, I like the idea of having a primary/secondary owner system
for each component.
Thanks,
Neha
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> I think that's a good idea. It will be good to have at least 2 maintainers
> per component.
>
> I'd encourage more people to review patches. T
I think that's a good idea. It will be good to have at least 2 maintainers
per component.
I'd encourage more people to review patches. The more patches one reviews,
the more familiar he/she is with the components.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Th
I think this idea has merits. I know I am much more comfortable in coding
to the core kafka producer code and implementing kafka consumes but want to
spend more time in the log code and a few other places (time always a
variable)
I think we could get a lot more lean on things if we went with this
