Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Using CML2 1.2.6, and going throught the same excersise on my home
> machine, I now get the following list of additional items between original
> saved .config and new generated config.out:
>
> CONFIG_ETRAX_DRAM_VIRTUAL_BASE=y
> CONFIG_NET_ISA=y
> CONFIG_PARIDE_
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here are the additional options set to y by the CML2 1.2.4 configurator:
>
> CONFIG_CPU_32=y
> CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC=y
> CONFIG_DRAM_VIRTUAL_BASE=y
> CONFIG_GSC_DINO=y
> CONFIG_MATHEMU=y
> CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS=y
I believe I've dealt with these properly in 1.2.6.
The latest version is always available at http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/
Release 1.2.5: Wed Apr 25 13:55:02 EDT 2001
* Synchronized with 2.4.4-pre6.
* Fixed KEY_HOME bug reported by Alex L. Mauer.
* Tom Rini's next round of PPC rules patches.
* Reference manual u
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here are the additional options set to y by the CML2 1.2.4 configurator:
>
> CONFIG_CPU_32=y
> CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC=y
> CONFIG_GSC_DINO=y
These are due to trivial errors in the 1.2.4 rulebase; I've fixed them
in the 1.2.5 I just issued.
> CONFIG_DRAM_VIRTUAL_B
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here are the additional options set to y by the CML2 1.2.4 configurator:
>
> CONFIG_CPU_32=y
> CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC=y
> CONFIG_DRAM_VIRTUAL_BASE=y
> CONFIG_GSC_DINO=y
> CONFIG_MATHEMU=y
> CONFIG_SA1100_BRUTUS=y
>
> It seems clear from reading the entries in Conf
[mec]
> > I'm in favor of a single unified list.
[Steven Cole]
> I agree with the above.
Peter
___
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
Greetings all,
I performed the following exercise with CML 1.2.4 and kernel 2.4.4-pre6:
Using a clean separate 2.4.4-pre6 tree, I ran CML2 1.2.4 make xconfig
starting with a .config from a CML1 2.4.4-pre6 tree.
I saved the configuration without changing anything, and then compared
the origi
Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's not in the one I just download. The HTML version on the website
> (which has all the info I need, thanks) says it is $Date: 2001/04/24 03:53:49 $
> but the one in the tarball is $Date: 2001/03/31 06:06:11 $, and it's
> unchanged from 1.2.3.
Aha! That was
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here is another little fix for the EXPERT help file, and a small
> addition for WIZARD, which at present only unsuppresses the kernel
> hacking menu. I was having trouble seeing the help for EXPERT and
> WIZARD, even though these entries had been appended prope
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm looking at kernel-tree/Documentation/kbuild/cml2-reference.sgml
> > in cml2-1.2.3.tar.gz. The string "nohelp" is not present anywhere,
> > nor is "?" "?:" or "trinary". I can't find any mention of ?: in the
> > BNF nor the pre
On Tuesday 24 April 2001 15:49, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> > Michael, is this correct for your entry?
>
> The state of Configure/Menuconfig/Xconfig is no longer "Maintained".
> "Orphan" is more accurate.
>
> Also you can list http://kbuild.sourceforge.net as our web site.
> It has links t
Greg Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm looking at kernel-tree/Documentation/kbuild/cml2-reference.sgml
> in cml2-1.2.3.tar.gz. The string "nohelp" is not present anywhere,
> nor is "?" "?:" or "trinary". I can't find any mention of ?: in the
> BNF nor the precedence table, nor of "nohelp" in th
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why doesn't esr's CML2 parser do the same ? If it is undocumented
> obscure feature, it WILL end up getting used. If it's not supposed
> to be there, then it should be checked against IMHO
I've added a test that complains:
"string symbol is not a legal submenu g
G'day
Today I discovered another problem in the Reference
document from cml2 1.2.3. Operators '>' and '<' are
present in the precedence table but not the BNF.
Greg.
--
These are my opinions not PPIs.
___
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
14 matches
Mail list logo
