Hi,
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Roman, a related Q.
> > Why not error out, or at least warn when encountering an unknow
> > symbol in a 'depends on' statement?
> >...
>
> That doesn't sound like a good idea, consider e.g.:
>
> config BAGETLANCE
> tristate "Baget AMD LANC
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:18:48 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
|
| > Hi,
|
| Hi Roman,
|
| > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| >
| > > Roman, is it intentional that PCMCIA!=n is true if there's no PCMCIA
| > > option, or is it sim
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Roman,
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Roman, is it intentional that PCMCIA!=n is true if there's no PCMCIA
> > option, or is it simply a bug?
>
> Yes, undefined symbols have a (string) value of "" . Maybe
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:40:32PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Roman, a related Q.
> Why not error out, or at least warn when encountering an unknow
> symbol in a 'depends on' statement?
>...
That doesn't sound like a good idea, consider e.g.:
config BAGETLANCE
tristate "Baget AMD LAN
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Roman, is it intentional that PCMCIA!=n is true if there's no PCMCIA
> option, or is it simply a bug?
Yes, undefined symbols have a (string) value of "" . Maybe it's time to
add a warning for such comparisons...
bye, Roman
--
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:17:25PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:12:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >...
> > On Samstag, 7. August 2004 19:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Is there eny reason for such options that are never visible nor enabled,
> > > or could they be remov
