On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 01:01:35AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Roman,
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > > What about normal numbers? I don't think requiring quotes everywhere for
> > > this is a good idea.
> >
> > And numbers (both decimal and hex) can easily be di
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 09:37:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > This is less a problem, as here it's clear that you want a boolean result,
> > > > but something like "FOO=n" is really a string compare
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > What about normal numbers? I don't think requiring quotes everywhere for
> > this is a good idea.
>
> And numbers (both decimal and hex) can easily be distinguished from y, n, and m
> anyway.
I did consider this at some point, but I didn't
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This is less a problem, as here it's clear that you want a boolean result,
> > > but something like "FOO=n" is really a string compare and FOO could be of
> > > any type (that 99% of all symbols are boolean/tri
Hi,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This is less a problem, as here it's clear that you want a boolean result,
> > but something like "FOO=n" is really a string compare and FOO could be of
> > any type (that 99% of all symbols are boolean/tristate symbols doesn't
> > really help).
