From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This should make sure that, for UML, host's configuration files are not
considered, which avoids various pains to the user. Our dependency are such that
the obtained Kconfig will be valid and will lead to successful
ve not the same Bison version so regenerating it wouldn't
have been not a good idea), and compared it with what Roman itself did some
time ago, and it's the same.
So I guess this can be finally merged.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:50, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > I can regenerate it only with bison 2.0, since that's what I have
> > installed. So if you don't want it to be regenerated, you cannot accept
> > my pat
ince that's what I have installed.
So if you don't want it to be regenerated, you cannot accept my patch. I
proposed sending two patches to avoid mixing the bison changes with this
patch changes, that's all.
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson
f.y.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.git-paolo/./scripts/kconfig/menu.c |4 ++--
linux-2.6.git-paolo/scripts/kconfig/lkc.h|2 +-
linux-2.6.git-paolo/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y |8
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 del
Sorry for the late answer, Yahoo put your mail in its Spam folder, and I
didn't check until now.
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 21:00, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > I've verified multiple times that if we have a situation
e(),
zconf_lineno(), $2);
};
Now, Kconfig handles well the same situation when there are multiple different
prompts, instead of multiple help texts.
This because the "prompt" is added as a property with its own dependency; why
is not this done for "help", too?
--
Pao
CC: Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Replace a menu_add_prop mimicking menu_add_prompt with the latter.
Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.11-paolo/scripts/kconfig/zconf.y |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
t a working
UML:
http://web.tiscali.it/no-redirect-tiscali/blaisorblade/linux/archives/UML/v8/00-Combo-v8.bz2
In that patch, there is a lot of stuff including *this* patch. If you need to
back it out, you can find it as H-Makefiles/H-02-User_obj_makefiles.patch(but
to unapply it you must unappl
Alle 11:45, giovedì 25 dicembre 2003, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
> Please don't use shouting names..
Ok. Then user-objs; or if this could be used somewhere else, uml-user-objs.
> > The list always contains, in the arch/um subfolders, all objects whose
> > name matches %_user.o(as it has alway
I'm a UML(User mode linux, the arch/um folder in 2.5/2.6) developer, and I
need some support to update its build system to the 2.6 changes.
The problem is that since that port of Linux runs as a normal process and
emulates a whole box, some of its source files must be compiled against
user-spac
This fixes a "typo" for Kconfig-language docs. It's against 2.6.0. I've
already sent this message to LKML, but there it could get lost.
Also, I would like to notify you that this ML archives are not lost, as you
claim on your web-page.
Go to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=kbuild-devel&r=1&w=2 t
12 matches
Mail list logo
