Dear sir,
I am using AODV protocol (nist aodvv 2.2.2-i386 or kernel aodv 2.2.2) on linux
Fedora core 7 with kernel 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7. This protocol was compiled already
for linux kernel 2.4 Now the same I need to use it on kernel 2.6 (FC7). But I
got some difficluties as below.The main is FA
Dear Sir
I am using Fedora core 7 . I have already existing some .o file
(Kernel_aodv.o) which was used on linux kernel 2.4. Now I am using it on FC7
(kernel 2.6). I got message FATAL:kernel_aodv module not found.
So you are requested how to do this.
i.e Now I want to convert that .o fi
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:30:30PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ive always wondered about this but never got around to asking ;)
>
> is the help text on the top level choice supposed to be usable ? for example:
> choice
> prompt "you [may] have a choice"
> default YES
> help
>
ive always wondered about this but never got around to asking ;)
is the help text on the top level choice supposed to be usable ? for example:
choice
prompt "you [may] have a choice"
default YES
help
This help text is never viewable :(
config YES
bool "yes"
help
Th
Hello Sam,
Thanks for your help. As per your suggestion I modified
the Makefile. However I get main.ko in the maind
directory and foobard.ko in foobard directory. These are
two independent kernel modules. I tried several other things
in the Makefile and I did not make any progress to build
one kern
Hi Suzzane
>However I would like to know if it is possible to have a Makefile
> inside the foobard directory that will link foobar1.o and foobar2.o
> into one say foobar.o and have the below line as:
The lowest granularity the kbuild system works with is a module.
So what you can do is to def
Hello,
I have a Kernel module source tree similar as below:
|
|--Makefile
|
|--maind
||
||
||-- main.c
|
|
|--foobard
||
|
|-- foobar1.c
|
|-- foobar2.c
The below make file works fine.
###
You can even choose to do this (which works fine here):
--- drivers/ide/Config.in.old Tue Nov 26 14:18:43 2002
+++ drivers/ide/Config.in Tue Nov 26 15:14:37 2002
@@ -38,6 +38,16 @@
comment 'IDE chipset support/bugfixes'
if [ "$CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE" != "n" ]; then
+ if [ "$CONFI
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 05:02:46PM +0100, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> Kernel: 2.4.19
> Summary: wording in BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI help text is misleading.
> Symptom: text contains no hint about Pmacs needing this option
> whenever BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC is selected leading to
>unresolv
Kernel: 2.4.19
Summary: wording in BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI help text is misleading.
Symptom: text contains no hint about Pmacs needing this option
whenever BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC is selected leading to
unresolved symbols at the final link. Been there done that...
Reasons: BLK_DEV
10 matches
Mail list logo
