Re: [kde] KDE's rough edges... what are your experiences?

2013-10-30 Thread Duncan
Kevin Krammer posted on Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:02:12 +0100 as excerpted: Hi Duncan, as usual thanks for the thorough explanations. I've noted a couple of minor inaccuracies, so here we go :) On Tuesday, 2013-10-29, 14:35:29, Duncan wrote: Both the kde foundations and the qt it's based on

Re: [kde] KDE's rough edges... what are your experiences?

2013-10-30 Thread Michael
Am Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:45:55 +0100 schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org: On Tuesday, 2013-10-29, 06:48:40, Michael wrote: Hi Frank, Am Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:36:02 +0100 schrieb Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de: I suppose right now the migration to 5.0 takes lots of developer

Re: [kde] KDE's rough edges... what are your experiences?

2013-10-30 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Wednesday, 2013-10-30, 18:00:46, Michael wrote: And on the thread itself, I did not talk about any applications, I only speak of the UI + widgets and its issues. I know the threshold might be fuzzy there sometimes. Right. There are more precise ways to address different products, e.g.

[kde] Spelling style on MLs (was: KDE's rough edges... what are your experiences?)

2013-10-30 Thread Michael
Am Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:20:15 + (UTC) schrieb Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net: Michael posted on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:59:12 +0100 as excerpted: Hell! Don't take it the wrong way, but I strongly suggest you rethink your way of communicating on mailinglists. You went in such lengths in