else would one expect
them to do? Some of them try to provide credible desktops.
John
From: Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net
To: kde@mail.kde.org
Sent: Mon, 18 April, 2011 4:47:05
Subject: [kde] Re: KDE Quality (problems) and my problems
John Longer posted on Sun, 17
Hi :)
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I use KDE since 1998/1999 with kde-1.1 beeing the first version I
remember having used.
I always found it to be simply the best Desktop Environment,
escpecially during KDE-2.x/3.x times.
Since KDE-4 I
On 04/14/2011 01:45 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi,
I use KDE since 1998/1999 with kde-1.1 beeing the first version I
remember having used.
I always found it to be simply the best Desktop Environment,
escpecially during KDE-2.x/3.x times.
Since KDE-4 I am not that happy anymore. Early
Hi,
I suppose we all have our favorite parts of KDE. For me it's Quanta. For
whatever reason the devs at wherever have pretty much decided it was not
worth the effort to bring it along with KDE 4.x. There is one person
trying to bring it along and I hope someday he manages to do it.
No
On 04/14/2011 08:59 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 14 April 2011 13:23:33 Billie Walsh wrote:
On 04/14/2011 01:45 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi,
I use KDE since 1998/1999 with kde-1.1 beeing the first version I
remember having used.
I always found it to be simply the best Desktop
On Thursday 14 April 2011 14:34:47 Billie Walsh wrote:
On 04/14/2011 08:20 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
Hi,
I suppose we all have our favorite parts of KDE. For me it's Quanta. For
whatever reason the devs at wherever have pretty much decided it was not
worth the effort to bring it
On Thursday 14 Apr 2011 15:29:17 Billie Walsh wrote:
On 04/14/2011 08:59 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 14 April 2011 13:23:33 Billie Walsh wrote:
I suppose we all have our favorite parts of KDE. For me it's Quanta. For
whatever reason the devs at wherever have pretty much decided it
On 04/14/2011 09:45 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
[...]
Another problem is the release cycle. The cycle is so short, that even
many bugs reported during
alpha stage aren't fixed. At release-time, devs are already working on
new features, often not backporting their fixes.
So you end up again
In my opinion, the major problem here is not the timing, but rather that
after putting version 4.N out, focus switches to version 4.N+1 instead
of focusing 90% on 4.N.1, .2, etc. This way, a truly nice, stable and
solid release in never achieved. The devs always hunt after the next
big
John Layt posted on Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:17:12 +0100 as excerpted:
On Thursday 14 Apr 2011 15:29:17 Billie Walsh wrote:
On 04/14/2011 08:59 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 14 April 2011 13:23:33 Billie Walsh wrote:
I suppose we all have our favorite parts of KDE. For me it's Quanta.
For
10 matches
Mail list logo
