On Thursday, 2013-10-31, 10:57:51, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote:
On Thursday, 2013-10-31, 11:48:10, Michael wrote:
Am Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:34:56 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
On Wednesday, 2013-10-30, 18:00:46,
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
...
[tl;dr summary, more modular-qt/kde-frameworks discussion]
Yay! Duncan, I love you :)
Regards, Myriam
--
Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community
Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE:
Am Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:58:43 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
On Thursday, 2013-10-31, 11:45:04, Michael wrote:
Am Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:35:29 + (UTC)
schrieb Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net:
Up the stack at the application level, kde5 is breaking up and
shipping most
On Friday, 2013-11-01, 17:31:33, Michael wrote:
Am Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:58:43 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
There are already quite some applications that have their own pace,
e.g. Amarok and Digikam, so this is mostly an option that might be
explored by more applicatons in
Am Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:34:56 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
On Wednesday, 2013-10-30, 18:00:46, Michael wrote:
And on the thread itself, I did not talk about any applications, I
only speak of the UI + widgets and its issues. I know the threshold
might be fuzzy there
On Thursday, 2013-10-31, 11:48:10, Michael wrote:
Am Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:34:56 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
On Wednesday, 2013-10-30, 18:00:46, Michael wrote:
And on the thread itself, I did not talk about any applications, I
only speak of the UI + widgets and its
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:54:50AM +0100, Kevin Krammer wrote:
On Thursday, 2013-10-31, 11:48:10, Michael wrote:
Am Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:34:56 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
On Wednesday, 2013-10-30, 18:00:46, Michael wrote:
And on the thread itself, I did not talk
Kevin Krammer posted on Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:02:12 +0100 as excerpted:
Hi Duncan,
as usual thanks for the thorough explanations.
I've noted a couple of minor inaccuracies, so here we go :)
On Tuesday, 2013-10-29, 14:35:29, Duncan wrote:
Both the kde foundations and the qt it's based on
Am Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:45:55 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
On Tuesday, 2013-10-29, 06:48:40, Michael wrote:
Hi Frank,
Am Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:36:02 +0100
schrieb Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de:
I suppose right now the migration to 5.0 takes lots of developer
On Wednesday, 2013-10-30, 18:00:46, Michael wrote:
And on the thread itself, I did not talk about any applications, I
only speak of the UI + widgets and its issues. I know the threshold
might be fuzzy there sometimes.
Right. There are more precise ways to address different products, e.g.
Kevin Krammer posted on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:29:37 +0100 as excerpted:
Well, you could have used a + instead of /, same number of characters,
no? :)
Mmm, indeed. Thanks for the hint. It makes sense and I'll file it away
to (hopefully remember to) use the next time. =:^)
--
Duncan - List
I'm going to disagree with you there DE. KDE is the most user friendly of
desktops I've yet found. Odd behavior plagues all desktops, especially
windoze. That Unity insanity which Windows 8 apparently attempted to
mirror, trying to walk a new user through that garbage is like trying to
learn a
Dnia 2013-10-29, o godz. 07:13:37
Draciron Smith draci...@gmail.com napisał(a):
The whole single click thing which cannot be modified too a
double click makes file transfers from disks an effort in frustration.
Unless something changed in 4.11 (I am still using 4.10), you can
go to
On Tuesday, 2013-10-29, 13:42:16, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
Dnia 2013-10-29, o godz. 07:13:37
Draciron Smith draci...@gmail.com napisał(a):
The whole single click thing which cannot be modified too a
double click makes file transfers from disks an effort in frustration.
Unless something
Michael posted on Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:48:40 +0100 as excerpted:
Oh, KDE4 is more or less in maintenance-mode? Err... scratch that. As
of now I still believe maintenance is something that does not apply well
to the KDE-kind-of development-style, so KDE4 is more or less obsolete
now?
That
Frank Steinmetzger posted on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:36:02 +0100 as excerpted:
But from a convenience standpoint, KDE beats them all with nice extra
features (KIO, global keyboard shortcuts, range of consistent
base-applications). And even though I have some issues with it now and
then (like
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 06:48:40AM +0100, Michael wrote:
Hi peops,
[…]
3.) Widgets, plasmoids, generel KDE features: Yeah well, really nice
design (mostly), but from a usability standpoint? Often a mess.
Plasma is a constant source of annoyance for me. I never really
understood
Michael posted on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:14:40 +0100 as excerpted:
Am Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:10:16 +0530 schrieb dE de.tec...@gmail.com:
I think KDE is not suitable for production environment. Just for casual
enthusiasts.
I guess that view is a bit too extreme, but interesting nevertheless. As
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:17:34PM +, Duncan wrote:
Frank Steinmetzger posted on Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:36:02 +0100 as
excerpted:
I thought of not sending this, as it is more like a collection of
bug whining, but after having spent lots of time on composing, it
would be a waste of
On Monday, 2013-10-28, 20:36:02, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:54:09AM +0100, Michael wrote:
Hi peops,
[…]
3.) Widgets, plasmoids, generel KDE features: Yeah well, really nice
design (mostly), but from a usability standpoint? Often a mess.
Plasma is a constant
On Tuesday, 2013-10-29, 06:48:40, Michael wrote:
Hi Frank,
Am Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:36:02 +0100
schrieb Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de:
I suppose right now the migration to 5.0 takes lots of developer
resources, so I imagine fixing bugs in “obsolete” 4 gets even less
attention. I
Hi Duncan,
as usual thanks for the thorough explanations.
I've noted a couple of minor inaccuracies, so here we go :)
On Tuesday, 2013-10-29, 14:35:29, Duncan wrote:
Both the kde foundations and the qt it's based on are becoming a lot more
modular, with the ability for developers to pick and
Kevin Krammer wrote, On 10/29/2013 06:53 AM:
On Tuesday, 2013-10-29, 13:42:16, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
Unless something changed in 4.11 (I am still using 4.10), you can
go to configuration dialog in Dolphin and there, in Navigation pane,
make double click open files (single click selects,
Kevin Krammer posted on Sun, 27 Oct 2013 21:23:05 +0100 as excerpted:
Those commercial/proprietary model proponents do have a point, that IS
a weakness of FLOSS
I think the problem with this statement is mixing terms for orthogonal
properties into one.
A commercial product is something
On 10/27/13 12:24, Michael wrote:
Hi peops,
I somewhat force myself to use KDE (once again), even though I am very
likely to get annoyed rather fast when it comes to the KDE-specific
kind of issues. Issues, I have never seen with any other project to
that extent. And I ask myself, if others are
On Monday, 2013-10-28, 09:42:07, Duncan wrote:
Kevin Krammer posted on Sun, 27 Oct 2013 21:23:05 +0100 as excerpted:
Those commercial/proprietary model proponents do have a point, that IS
a weakness of FLOSS
I think the problem with this statement is mixing terms for orthogonal
On Monday, 2013-10-28, 16:10:16, dE wrote:
I think KDE is not suitable for production environment. Just for casual
enthusiasts.
I guess it will depend on the definition of those terms. I am sure the people
who use KDE as their work place environment will enjoy learning that they are
Hi Duncan,
Hell! Don't take it the wrong way, but I strongly suggest you rethink
your way of communicating on mailinglists. You went in such lengths
in absolutely unrelated topics and even with slightly related topics
you went by far, far, far, far to deep. It was really no pleasure at
all to
Am Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:12:41 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
Hi Michael,
On Monday, 2013-10-28, 12:22:15, Michael wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Am Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:08:10 +0100
schrieb Kevin Krammer kram...@kde.org:
On Sunday, 2013-10-27, 07:54:09, Michael wrote:
Granted,
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:54:09AM +0100, Michael wrote:
Hi peops,
[…]
3.) Widgets, plasmoids, generel KDE features: Yeah well, really nice
design (mostly), but from a usability standpoint? Often a mess.
Plasma is a constant source of annoyance for me. I never really
understood the need for a
Hi Frank,
Am Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:36:02 +0100
schrieb Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 07:54:09AM +0100, Michael wrote:
Hi peops,
[…]
3.) Widgets, plasmoids, generel KDE features: Yeah well, really nice
design (mostly), but from a usability standpoint? Often a
On Sunday, 2013-10-27, 07:54:09, Michael wrote:
Granted, not all issues will face on every system, something triggers
the issues, sure. Not all users will think some stuff is implemented
weird and in a rather un-usable state (even if I think something must
be wrong with them then, as I can
On Sunday, 2013-10-27, 16:47:08, Duncan wrote:
FWIW, my thinking on this is that it just happens that the kde devs (and
in particular the plasma devs, since that's the desktop kde uses) have a
particularly bad case of one of the traits very common to free and open
source application
33 matches
Mail list logo
