[valgrind] [Bug 405365] PPC64, function _get_maxmin_fp_NaN() doesn't handle QNaN, SNaN case correctly

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405365 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED Resolution

[valgrind] [Bug 405365] PPC64, function _get_maxmin_fp_NaN() doesn't handle QNaN, SNaN case correctly

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405365 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because

[valgrind] [Bug 405734] PPC64, vrlwnm, vrlwmi, vrldrm, vrldmi do not work properly when me < mb

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405734 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REPORTED

[valgrind] [Bug 405734] PPC64, vrlwnm, vrlwmi, vrldrm, vrldmi do not work properly when me < mb

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405734 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love --- Created attachment 118977 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118977=edit Fix for vrlwnm, vrlwmi, vrldrm, vrldmi instructions The attached patch was committed to fix the issue. com

[valgrind] [Bug 405733] PPC64, xvcvdpsp should write 32-bit result to upper and lower 32-bits of the 64-bit destination field.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405733 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #118975|0 |1 is obsolete

[valgrind] [Bug 405733] PPC64, xvcvdpsp should write 32-bit result to upper and lower 32-bits of the 64-bit destination field.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405733 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love --- Created attachment 118975 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118975=edit fix for the xvcvdpsp instruction The attached patch was committed to fix the issue. commit 91bd56be4153cb5cf6d1fa80ade4b2432ff81

[valgrind] [Bug 405365] PPC64, function _get_maxmin_fp_NaN() doesn't handle QNaN, SNaN case correctly

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405365 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love --- Created attachment 118974 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118974=edit fix the _get_maxmin_fp_NAN function The attached patch was committed to fix the issue. com

[valgrind] [Bug 405363] PPC64, xvcvdpsxws, xvcvdpuxws, do not handle NaN arguments correctly.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405363 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love --- Created attachment 118973 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118973=edit fix for instructions xvcvdpsxws, xvcvdpuxws The patch was committed to fix the issue. com

[valgrind] [Bug 405362] PPC64, vmsummbm instruction doesn't handle overflow case correctly

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405362 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love --- Created attachment 118972 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118972=edit fix for vmsummbm instruction The attached patch fixes the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all

[valgrind] [Bug 405356] PPC64, xvcvsxdsp, xvcvuxdsp are supposed to write the 32-bit result to the upper and lower 32-bits of the 64-bit result

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405356 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love --- Created attachment 118971 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=118971=edit fix for xvcvsxdsp and xvcvuxddp instructions The attached patch was committed to fix the issue. -- You are receiving this m

[valgrind] [Bug 405734] New: PPC64, vrlwnm, vrlwmi, vrldrm, vrldmi do not work properly when me < mb

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405734 Bug ID: 405734 Summary: PPC64, vrlwnm, vrlwmi, vrldrm, vrldmi do not work properly when me < mb Product: valgrind Version: 3.15 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux

[valgrind] [Bug 405733] New: PPC64, xvcvdpsp should write 32-bit result to upper and lower 32-bits of the 64-bit destination field.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405733 Bug ID: 405733 Summary: PPC64, xvcvdpsp should write 32-bit result to upper and lower 32-bits of the 64-bit destination field. Product: valgrind Version: 3.15 SVN Platform: Other

[valgrind] [Bug 405365] New: PPC64, function _get_maxmin_fp_NaN() doesn't handle QNaN, SNaN case correctly

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405365 Bug ID: 405365 Summary: PPC64, function _get_maxmin_fp_NaN() doesn't handle QNaN, SNaN case correctly Product: valgrind Version: 3.15 SVN Platform: Other OS:

[valgrind] [Bug 405363] New: PPC64, xvcvdpsxws, xvcvdpuxws, do not handle NaN arguments correctly.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405363 Bug ID: 405363 Summary: PPC64, xvcvdpsxws, xvcvdpuxws, do not handle NaN arguments correctly. Product: valgrind Version: 3.15 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux

[valgrind] [Bug 405362] New: PPC64, vmsummbm instruction doesn't handle overflow case correctly

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405362 Bug ID: 405362 Summary: PPC64, vmsummbm instruction doesn't handle overflow case correctly Product: valgrind Version: 3.15 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux

[valgrind] [Bug 405356] New: PPC64, xvcvsxdsp, xvcvuxdsp are supposed to write the 32-bit result to the upper and lower 32-bits of the 64-bit result

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405356 Bug ID: 405356 Summary: PPC64, xvcvsxdsp, xvcvuxdsp are supposed to write the 32-bit result to the upper and lower 32-bits of the 64-bit result Product: valgrind

[valgrind] [Bug 398883] valgrind incorrectly assumes ABI on PowerPC based on endianness

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398883 --- Comment #4 from Carl Love --- IBM only supports ELFv1 ABI on Big endian machines and ELFv2 ABI on Little endian machines. I checked a little on the statements about the ELF usages. >From what I was told OpenSuSE uses ELFv2 ABI on little end

[valgrind] [Bug 404054] Recognize powerpc subfe x, x, x to initialize x to zero or -1 based on CA

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404054 --- Comment #6 from Carl Love --- It all looks valid to me. I didn't see any issues with the patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 386945] Bogus memcheck errors on ppc64(le) when using strcmp() with gcc-7

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386945 --- Comment #48 from Carl Love --- Mark: I took your patch " implement ldbrx as 64-bit load and Iop_Reverse8sIn64_x1" in comment 44, attachment 116593 and applied it to current mainline. commit f2387ed7bed64571197b44c1f8abae4d907bce1b Au

[valgrind] [Bug 386945] Bogus memcheck errors on ppc64(le) when using strcmp() with gcc-7

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386945 --- Comment #32 from Carl Love --- Aaron, it sounds like you ran make regtest with and without the patch and didn't see any errors. The regtest includes a fairly good test of vpopcntd in test jm_vec_isa_2_07. So as long as you didn't see any

[valgrind] [Bug 391164] constraint bug in tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part1.c for mtfprwa

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391164 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because

[valgrind] [Bug 391164] constraint bug in tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part1.c for mtfprwa

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391164 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|CONFIRMED

[valgrind] [Bug 395709] PPC64 is missing support for the xvnegsp instruction

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395709 --- Comment #4 from Carl Love --- Argh. Comment 3 was the wrong commit. Should have been commit 1f69ed86e994ee152a0e6e3ee7031d0105f02a7e Author: Carl Love Date: Mon Jun 25 16:24:14 2018 -0500 Fix ppc32 results for test_isa_2_06_part3.c

[valgrind] [Bug 395709] PPC64 is missing support for the xvnegsp instruction

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395709 --- Comment #3 from Carl Love --- Missed updating the ppc32 expected results. commit 3df8d81f000a47c02a289ac9f4ba64fc4df9077e Author: Carl Love Date: Tue Jun 26 09:51:11 2018 -0500 PPC32, update expected results for jm_vec_isa_2_07.c. Add

[valgrind] [Bug 395709] PPC64 is missing support for the xvnegsp instruction

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395709 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution

[valgrind] [Bug 395709] PPC64 is missing support for the xvnegsp instruction

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395709 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confirmed|0

[valgrind] [Bug 395709] PPC64 is missing support for the xvnegsp instruction

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395709 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love --- Created attachment 113492 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=113492=edit Add support for the xvnegsp instruction Create attachment with the patch to add support. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[valgrind] [Bug 395709] New: PPC64 is missing support for the xvnegsp instruction

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395709 Bug ID: 395709 Summary: PPC64 is missing support for the xvnegsp instruction Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[valgrind] [Bug 393017] Add missing support for xsmaxcdp instruction, bug fixes for xsmincdp, lxssp, stxssp and stxvl instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393017 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 393017] Add missing support for xsmaxcdp instruction, bug fixes for xsmincdp, lxssp, stxssp and stxvl instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393017 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Reso

[valgrind] [Bug 393017] Add missing support for xsmaxcdp instruction, bug fixes for xsmincdp, lxssp, stxssp and stxvl instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393017 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCON

[valgrind] [Bug 393017] New: Add missing support for xsmaxcdp instruction, bug fixes for xsmincdp, lxssp, stxssp and stxvl instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393017 Bug ID: 393017 Summary: Add missing support for xsmaxcdp instruction, bug fixes for xsmincdp, lxssp, stxssp and stxvl instructions Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN

[valgrind] [Bug 391164] constraint bug in tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part1.c for mtfprwa

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391164 --- Comment #6 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Peter noted that I had a couple register constraint issues with the new tests. The errors were fixed in the following Valgrind commit. commit 839b244af27d6b7d27001c10ed308c485fecd3a8 Author: Car

[valgrind] [Bug 391164] constraint bug in tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part1.c for mtfprwa

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391164 --- Comment #5 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Added some missing test cases to test_isa_2_01_part1.c. commit 9afb136f591c59bfb138e5b141ca59fe0d9e04af Author: Carl Love <ca...@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue Feb 27 17:52:01 2018 -0600 PP

[valgrind] [Bug 391164] constraint bug in tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part1.c for mtfprwa

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391164 --- Comment #4 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Change committed. commit 03c97360866c027bcc77d5c4872e66032dac3671 Author: Carl Love <ca...@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue Feb 27 12:41:43 2018 -0600 Bug 391164: constraint bug in

[valgrind] [Bug 391164] constraint bug in tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part1.c for mtfprwa

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391164 --- Comment #3 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- >From IRC, Mark asked that I do the commit. I will do the commit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 391164] constraint bug in tests/ppc64/test_isa_2_07_part1.c for mtfprwa

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391164 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- I did the regression testing and some hand testing of the change to independently verify the change is OK. Note, the source for the test is in none/tests/ppc32/test_isa_2_07_part1.c. The entr

[valgrind] [Bug 387664] Memcheck: make expensive-definedness-checks be the default

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387664 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Patch tested on Power 8 BE, Power 8 LE and Power 9. No regression errors were found on any of the systems. The time command was used to record how long it took to run the regression test.

[valgrind] [Bug 386397] valgrind truncates powerpc timebase to 32-bits

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386397 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 386397] valgrind truncates powerpc timebase to 32-bits

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386397 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[valgrind] [Bug 386397] valgrind truncates powerpc timebase to 32-bits

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386397 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108657 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108657=edit Fix for reading the time base register -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 386397] New: valgrind truncates powerpc timebase to 32-bits

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386397 Bug ID: 386397 Summary: valgrind truncates powerpc timebase to 32-bits Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] PPC64, fix vpermr, xxperm, xxpermr mask value.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] PPC64, fix vpermr, xxperm, xxpermr mask value.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Reso

[valgrind] [Bug 385210] vpermr instruction could exhaust temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385210 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Reso

[valgrind] [Bug 385210] vpermr instruction could exhaust temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385210 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 385208] xxperm instruction exhausts temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385208 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 385207] PPC64, generate_store_FPRF() generates too many Iops

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385207 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 385208] xxperm instruction exhausts temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385208 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[valgrind] [Bug 385207] PPC64, generate_store_FPRF() generates too many Iops

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385207 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Reso

[valgrind] [Bug 385183] PPC64 missing support for xscmpeqdp, xscmpgtdp, xscmpgedp, xsmincdp instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385183 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 385183] PPC64 missing support for xscmpeqdp, xscmpgtdp, xscmpgedp, xsmincdp instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385183 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Reso

[valgrind] [Bug 385182] PPC64 is missing support for the DSCR

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385182 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are rec

[valgrind] [Bug 385182] PPC64 is missing support for the DSCR

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385182 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Reso

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] PPC64, fix vpermr, xxperm, xxpermr mask value.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 --- Comment #8 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- patch committed. commit 856d45eb7e3661a61ace32be2cfa10bf198620c8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] PPC64, fix vpermr, xxperm, xxpermr mask value.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|fix vpermr, xxperm, xxpermr |PPC64, fix vpermr,

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] fix vpermr, xxperm, xxpermr mask value.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|vperm instruction index |fix vpermr, xxperm, x

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] vperm instruction index mask bug

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #108173|0 |1 is ob

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] vperm instruction index mask bug

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #108147|0 |1 is ob

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] vperm instruction index mask bug

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 --- Comment #4 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- The issue is with the vpermr and xxpermr instructions that were reimplemented based on the vperm instruction. In those implementations, the mask needed to be 0x1F instead of 0xF and th

[valgrind] [Bug 385183] PPC64 missing support for xscmpeqdp, xscmpgtdp, xscmpgedp, xsmincdp instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385183 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCON

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] vperm instruction index mask bug

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 --- Comment #3 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- I will go back and look at this again. The issue was actually seen in the re-working of the vpermr, xxperm, xxpermr. The code from the vperm was used to implement the other instru

[valgrind] [Bug 385210] vpermr instruction could exhaust temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385210 --- Comment #5 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- committed patch: commit b0aef250a74804423341b3ce804355037211e330 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 385208] xxperm instruction exhausts temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385208 --- Comment #3 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- commited patch: commit a1d03d0d11c0b31a6d9f57baa4d46317fdd5f6ef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[valgrind] [Bug 385207] PPC64, generate_store_FPRF() generates too many Iops

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385207 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confi

[valgrind] [Bug 385182] PPC64 is missing support for the DSCR

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385182 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCON

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] vperm instruction index mask bug

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108147 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108147=edit vperm instuction, fix index mask Add patch to fix issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] vperm instruction index mask bug

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCON

[valgrind] [Bug 385210] vpermr instruction could exhaust temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385210 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #108095|0 |1 is ob

[valgrind] [Bug 385334] New: vperm instruction index mask bug

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385334 Bug ID: 385334 Summary: vperm instruction index mask bug Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[valgrind] [Bug 385210] vpermr instruction could exhaust temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385210 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCON

[valgrind] [Bug 385183] PPC64 missing support for xscmpeqdp, xscmpgtdp, xscmpgedp, xsmincdp instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385183 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #108097|0 |1 is ob

[valgrind] [Bug 385183] PPC64 missing support for xscmpeqdp, xscmpgtdp, xscmpgedp, xsmincdp instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385183 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #108091|0 |1 is ob

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 --- Comment #9 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- The video user test case has additional issues with missing instruction support and the DSCR register not not supported. Work on this bug also included reworking the vpermr instruction implemen

[valgrind] [Bug 385210] vpermr instruction could exhaust temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385210 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108095 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108095=edit re-implement vpermr instruction to generate fewer iops Patch reworks the vpermr instruction to use the Iop

[valgrind] [Bug 385210] New: vpermr instruction could exhaust temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385210 Bug ID: 385210 Summary: vpermr instruction could exhaust temporary memory Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[valgrind] [Bug 385208] xxperm instruction exhausts temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385208 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108094 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108094=edit re-implement xxperm instruction The xxperm code was re-implemented using the Iop_Perm8x16 similarly to

[valgrind] [Bug 385208] xxperm instruction exhausts temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385208 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confi

[valgrind] [Bug 385208] New: xxperm instruction exhausts temporary memory

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385208 Bug ID: 385208 Summary: xxperm instruction exhausts temporary memory Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[valgrind] [Bug 385207] PPC64, generate_store_FPRF() generates too many Iops

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385207 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108093 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108093=edit replace body of generate_store_FPRF with C helper function. replace the generate_store_FPRF function body

[valgrind] [Bug 385207] New: PPC64, generate_store_FPRF() generates too many Iops

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385207 Bug ID: 385207 Summary: PPC64, generate_store_FPRF() generates too many Iops Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED

[valgrind] [Bug 385182] PPC64 is missing support for the DSCR

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385182 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #108079|0 |1 is ob

[valgrind] [Bug 385183] PPC64 missing support for xscmpeqdp, xscmpgtdp, xscmpgedp, xsmincdp instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385183 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108091 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108091=edit Add support for missing instructions add patch file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are wat

[valgrind] [Bug 385182] PPC64 is missing support for the DSCR

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385182 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108079 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108079=edit patch to add DSCR attached patch to add missing DSCR support -- You are receiving this mail bec

[valgrind] [Bug 385183] New: PPC64 missing support for xscmpeqdp, xscmpgtdp, xscmpgedp, xsmincdp instructions

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385183 Bug ID: 385183 Summary: PPC64 missing support for xscmpeqdp, xscmpgtdp, xscmpgedp, xsmincdp instructions Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS:

[valgrind] [Bug 385182] New: PPC64 is missing support for the DSCR

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385182 Bug ID: 385182 Summary: PPC64 is missing support for the DSCR Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #108069|0 |1 is ob

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 --- Comment #7 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108069 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108069=edit Use vperm Iop code with minor modifications to implement the xxperm and xxpermr instructions The xxperm ins

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #108050|0 |1 is ob

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 --- Comment #5 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 108050 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108050=edit replace body of generate_store_FPRF with C helper function. Created C helper to replace the Iop code to

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- The second workload that hits the same issue is a GCC instruction test. The test runs a whole bunch of float 128-bit instructions to test the code generation. In this case, there are s

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED Ever confi

[valgrind] [Bug 385055] New: PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385055 Bug ID: 385055 Summary: PPC VEX temporary storage exhausted Product: valgrind Version: 3.14 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[valgrind] [Bug 379925] PPC64, mtffs does not set the FPCC and C bits in the FPSCR register

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379925 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #3 fro

[valgrind] [Bug 379925] PPC64, mtffs does not set the FPCC and C bits in the FPSCR register

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379925 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Reso

[valgrind] [Bug 379925] PPC64, mtffs does not set the FPCC and C bits in the FPSCR register

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379925 --- Comment #1 from Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> --- Created attachment 105610 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=105610=edit patch for the mffs and additional issues Some additional fixes: - Fix mffs instruction, FPSCR, C_FPCC fie

[valgrind] [Bug 379703] stxv and stxvx instructions for ISA 3.0 have bugs

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379703 Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #4 fro

[valgrind] [Bug 379925] New: PPC64, mtffs does not set the FPCC and C bits in the FPSCR register

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379925 Bug ID: 379925 Summary: PPC64, mtffs does not set the FPCC and C bits in the FPSCR register Product: valgrind Version: 3.10 SVN Platform: Other OS: Linux

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >