https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416213
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416071
--- Comment #2 from MarcP ---
Mmm, I have merged tags in the past, but I am sure that the tags I used for
searches were not affected by any merge. I'll try to reproduce the behavior in
a controlled environment with a test database and report back
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416071
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416071
Bug ID: 416071
Summary: Saved searches that include tags are altered after
tags are reorganized
Product: digikam
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415867
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295334
--- Comment #11 from MarcP ---
Bug 392023 is most likely a duplicate as well.
I think the best option, as the original poster suggested, would be to create
two categories: One for "Ignored" faces, and another one for "Deleted&qu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415999
--- Comment #2 from MarcP ---
Aha. It could be what you say. What I usually see, is a bar for each tagged
image, and the one on top being the one that appears to go backwards.
Here is an example: https://imgur.com/a/OygbhZs
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415782
--- Comment #14 from MarcP ---
Or what about preventing recognizing faces for people with a very low sample?
(e.g. fewer than 15 or 20 faces)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415782
--- Comment #13 from MarcP ---
I have also noticed that the precision of face recognition did not improve if a
person had more pictures. Until that moment, I had tried the face recognition
algorithm using a dataset of 85 famous people
(http://vis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415782
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415999
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415999
Bug ID: 415999
Summary: Progress bar goes backwards when tagging faces (from
(100% to 0%)
Product: digikam
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402322
--- Comment #11 from MarcP ---
Sure, no problem, it's not a big deal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402322
--- Comment #9 from MarcP ---
I still think we are not talking about the same thing. Of course, if new items
are found/detected before the one I am selecting, they will be displaced. But
the selected items should still be the same.
Don't worry, I'll
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402322
--- Comment #7 from MarcP ---
No, but I am not talking about the position. I mean the actual items that you
have selected change. Like, if you selected DSC0234.JPG, it suddenly switches
and is now DSC0235.JPG that is selected (without clicking or doing
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402322
--- Comment #5 from MarcP ---
I have found another weird behavior related to this topic, so I'll try to
report it here before I forget.
Sometimes, while digikam is in process of detecting or recognizing faces (not
sure which one), and you select
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414028
--- Comment #13 from MarcP ---
I just realized I replied to the duplicated bug file, so let me link that
comment here too, since it is still relevant:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414016#c13
(Basically, the bug is still relevant in digikam
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414016
--- Comment #13 from MarcP ---
Hi. I tried scanning and rebuilding the faces database this morning (well, it's
still in progress), and both the /var/log/syslog and the journal seemed to have
increased significantly in size (between 1 and 2 GB together
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414016
--- Comment #10 from MarcP ---
I will try tomorrow and report back.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415878
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399108
--- Comment #4 from MarcP ---
Hi Gilles,
I don't believe it's a duplicate. This wish refers to a panel where people in
the selected picture(s) appear in a panel on the right, and in #415565 just
considers adding a face as a tag icon automatically
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415796
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405980
--- Comment #11 from MarcP ---
I think we should keep these two issues separately. The original report deals
with an incorrect face region due to the picture rotation, and now we are
commenting about the zoom level in the face regions (I have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392016
--- Comment #6 from MarcP ---
Oh, both features have already been implemented. Activate the item count in the
settings for the tree view and you'll see a notification next to each name when
new faces have been recognized.
Thanks a lot, and enjoy
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402322
--- Comment #4 from MarcP ---
I have narrowed it down a bit.
When tagging people in the Unknown category, it is fine unless digikam is
actively writing metadata to files. For instance, when you select a few faces
and enter their name, it will write
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415566
Bug ID: 415566
Summary: Use existing face rectangles to improve recognition
Product: digikam
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415566
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415565
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415565
Bug ID: 415565
Summary: Show face as icon for each person in the People panel.
Product: digikam
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Other
OS: All
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380336
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395236
--- Comment #7 from MarcP ---
I think that this wish is specially relevant now, since the options to detect
and to recognize faces cannot be run simultaneously. Detecting faces as
pictures are imported would really simplify the process (the user would
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402322
--- Comment #3 from MarcP ---
I can confirm this bug is still present in 7.0.0beta1. While digikam is working
detecting or recognising faces, the face list moves constantly (I guess faces
are being added or removed), and it is impossible to type a name
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402322
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404167
--- Comment #2 from MarcP ---
The process is much easier now that unconfirmed faces are surrounded with a
green frame. However, the unconfirmed faces still use the sort order like any
other album, so they usually appear in between already confirmed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392024
--- Comment #3 from MarcP ---
Testing at this very moment :)
One thing about face recognition, is that new users wouldn't know what to do to
start recognizing new faces. Basically you first have to detect the faces (can
be done from the right-click
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414424
--- Comment #4 from MarcP ---
Oh, I see. So there is no quick way of showing the number of containing
pictures (the number that appears at the bottom left in Digikam) without having
to query each tag, right?
In that case, maybe the initial behavior
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414424
--- Comment #2 from MarcP ---
Hey. I tried the latest appimage
(digikam-7.0.0-git-20191204T041752-x86-64.appimage) and I noticed that now the
tag count only shows the number of pictures tagged with that specific tag, but
ignoring subtags. Would
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414428
--- Comment #6 from MarcP ---
Hi. Yes, the grey is not as dark as in other dark themes, but it is done on
purpose as not to contrast a lot with the text (which is in a lighter shade of
gray). Actually, it is similar in color to the dark theme in Gimp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414428
--- Comment #4 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 124082
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=124082=edit
Optimal-DK-darker.colors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414428
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414428
--- Comment #1 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 124079
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=124079=edit
Optimal-DK.colors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414428
--- Comment #3 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 124081
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=124081=edit
Optimal-DK-lighter.colors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414428
--- Comment #2 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 124080
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=124080=edit
Optimal-DK-contrast.colors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414428
Bug ID: 414428
Summary: Dark themes for Digikam (Optimal-DK)
Product: digikam
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Other
OS: All
Status: REPORTED
Severity: wishlist
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414420
--- Comment #3 from MarcP ---
Yes, that XMP sidecar was created by digikam (version 6.4.0), last week if I
recall correctly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414424
Bug ID: 414424
Summary: Wishlist: Item count for tag tree is not very
intuitive. Maybe show number of total items and
subtags separately?
Product: digikam
Version:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414424
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414420
--- Comment #1 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 124075
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=124075=edit
DSCN1382.MOV
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414420
Bug ID: 414420
Summary: Date/time in sidecar files for Videos seems to be
ignored by digikam
Product: digikam
Version: 6.4.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414420
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414028
--- Comment #6 from MarcP ---
Also affects Ubuntu 18.04 LTS.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414016
--- Comment #5 from MarcP ---
If I watch the /var/log/syslog in real time, I can see basically everything
digikam is doing, as if I had launched it from a terminal. And same for other
programs I am running.
I think that temporarily I'll limit the size
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414016
--- Comment #2 from MarcP ---
Ok, understood.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414016
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414016
Bug ID: 414016
Summary: Log file /var/log/syslog grows in size very fast
Product: digikam
Version: 6.4.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303239
--- Comment #8 from MarcP ---
I am not sure. I mostly used grouping to group duplicated, very similar, or
edited version of the same picture, often in different directories. The problem
with that is that pictures not on the top of the stack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392363
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386379
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413938
--- Comment #10 from MarcP ---
Wow, you are the best!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413938
--- Comment #6 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123793
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123793=edit
Case1.jpg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413938
--- Comment #7 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123794
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123794=edit
Case2.jpg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413938
--- Comment #5 from MarcP ---
Sure, no problem. I have attached two pictures. This is their current and only
metadata:
Case1.jpg Case2.jpg
[X] Ontario [ ] Ontario
[x] Toronto
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413938
--- Comment #1 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123791
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123791=edit
Screen capture showing the issue
This is a screen capture showing the problem with just two files. Observe how
the Case2.jpg picture
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413938
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413938
Bug ID: 413938
Summary: Metadata is not written to all pictures in a tag
hierarchy
Product: digikam
Version: 6.4.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #24 from MarcP ---
I started fresh with a new digikamrc config file, and enabling those options
("Cleanup database when file re-scanned"), the issue is still there. However,
it does not remove face tags, just regular tags
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #20 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123784
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123784=edit
Offending digikamrc configuration file
I have attached the offending digikamrc configuration file, in case you want to
have a l
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #19 from MarcP ---
No, I don't think I have ever changed anything from the advanced metadata
settings (I can send you a screenshot if you want). I also have all sidecars
disabled, and in the behavior tab, I only have selected the three last
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #17 from MarcP ---
Ok, I see, that option was the source of the problem. But I don't see why it
should work this way. In theory, when entering the reverse geocoding tool, it
should read the current picture metadata, and not just overwrite
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #15 from MarcP ---
Ok, so I captured the output of this action in debug mode. I decided to
separate the logs in four parts, so it's clear what digikam is doing in each
one of them.
1) I write a test tag called "test tag" to t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #123780|0 |1
is obsolete
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #13 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123780
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123780=edit
4. Clicking "Apply", saving the new tags to file
At this point, is when the "test tag" is deleted from th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #12 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123779
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123779=edit
3. Applying reverse geolocation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #11 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123778
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123778=edit
2. Opening reverse geolocation tool
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #10 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123777
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123777=edit
1. Writing "test tag" to picture.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #7 from MarcP ---
No, I have sidecars disabled completely (both read and write).
Maybe it's that particular build. Do you want me to test a specific version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #5 from MarcP ---
No, the low disk space was something temporary because some log files grew
unexpectedly huge in my system. But when that happened, no tags could even be
saved.
I tried right now, from a fresh Digikam session, and I can
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #3 from MarcP ---
I will try to reproduce it using some test pictures, to try to find out in
which cases it happen.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413842
Bug ID: 413842
Summary: Wishlist: search not sensitive to special characters /
diacritics
Product: digikam
Version: 6.4.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413842
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413839
Bug ID: 413839
Summary: Digikam not aware when there is no disk space
available
Product: digikam
Version: 6.4.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
Status:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413839
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
--- Comment #1 from MarcP ---
Sorry, I meant "I have been reverse geolocation several groups of pictures
(...)"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413837
Bug ID: 413837
Summary: Reverse geolocation deletes previous tags from the
picture
Product: digikam
Version: 6.4.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397872
--- Comment #3 from MarcP ---
I would also like to add a few things.
- First, something that took me some time to realize. When you want to reverse
geocode several pictures, first you have to select which pictures from the list
you want to process
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411550
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406019
--- Comment #8 from MarcP ---
I just tried that same picture album in another computer, with the same digikam
version (digikam-6.4.0-git-20191005T120037-x86-64.appimage) and none of the
images showed this issue. So it's most likely not related
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406019
--- Comment #6 from MarcP ---
I don't think it's the images' fault. Sometimes, changing some metadata and
forcing digikam to rebuild the thumbnails corrects it. Also, it does not happen
for the same pictures in two different computers (or even
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406019
--- Comment #4 from MarcP ---
Created attachment 123067
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=123067=edit
Another example
(This issue was quite prominent on a few pictures I scanned yesterday)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412168
Bug ID: 412168
Summary: Wishlist: Feedback after scanning for faces
Product: digikam
Version: 7.0.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412168
MarcP changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
401 - 492 of 492 matches
Mail list logo
