https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490378
--- Comment #1 from Rob D ---
Created attachment 171718
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=171718&action=edit
Screenshot of error
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490378
Bug ID: 490378
Summary: Check for upgrade fails to download. Files ending
with .sha256
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: 8.3.0
Platform: Microsoft Window
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479655
Bug ID: 479655
Summary: Impliment auto-tagging in icon-view
Classification: Applications
Product: digikam
Version: 8.3.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393158
--- Comment #12 from Rob D ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #11)
> How is the geolocation editor supposed to know which of all the tags are the
> location tags? The Tags column is only intended to show when new ones are
> added.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453630
--- Comment #3 from Rob D ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #2)
> Which git/master digiKam-8.0.0 version are you using exactly? I just tested
> it here quickly, but I don't see any difference whether the tags were
> written
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453630
Bug ID: 453630
Summary: Metadata doesn 't always keep it's hierarchy when
written with exiftool
Product: digikam
Version: 8.0.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449080
--- Comment #5 from Rob D ---
I would have expected that if address elements have been defined, a path for
tag information could be determined and the information filled in.It was
just a thought for an enhancement.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449080
--- Comment #2 from Rob D ---
All versions. Every version if Digikam since 5.0 that I can remember
(not sure whick version introduced reverse geotagging)
This is on all versions I've downloaded, as well as build from source
up to and including
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449080
Bug ID: 449080
Summary: Assigned tags not appearing in geolocation editor
Product: digikam
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified
OS: All
Status: REPORTED
Se
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435020
--- Comment #2 from Rob D ---
I would have expected that looking for a final release would work. Looking
for the next pre-release brings a version from the new 7.3 tree.
The default setting for updates is set for stable releases. Thus, if someone
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435020
Bug ID: 435020
Summary: Check for new version doesn't find updated released
version
Product: digikam
Version: 7.2.0
Platform: Microsoft Windows
OS: Microsoft Windo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431748
Rob D changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Linux |All
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431748
Bug ID: 431748
Summary: Feature Request: Search by month/day independent of
year
Product: digikam
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426309
--- Comment #19 from Rob D ---
Things look and work great, Maik
Thanks!
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 21:34 +, Maik Qualmann wrote:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426309
>
> Maik Qualmann changed:
>
> W
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426309
--- Comment #17 from Rob D ---
I uncommented the yolo lines in the code and the proper files also
downloaded. Re-checked face detection and all worked great!
Off to a good start! Now to just add the detection method selector and
life is good!
Rob
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426309
--- Comment #13 from Rob D ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #12)
> At the moment the "yolov3-wider_16000.weights" is of interest to us. This is
> already included in the digiKam source code. It is not installed becau
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426309
--- Comment #8 from Rob D ---
(In reply to Minh Nghia Duong from comment #7)
> (In reply to Rob D from comment #6)
I was thinking of maybe having an additional selector for choose an available
detection model, with a button that would bring u
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426309
--- Comment #6 from Rob D ---
(In reply to Minh Nghia Duong from comment #5)
> Hi all,
>
> Say that we can support customized face detection backend. How do you intend
> to use it after importing the data files?
>
> For example, how
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426309
Bug ID: 426309
Summary: Support face detection back ends that require larger
data sets
Product: digikam
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407948
--- Comment #7 from Rob D ---
New version from GIT skips movie/video files as expected.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407948
--- Comment #2 from Rob D ---
Hi Maik.
I run under the Gnome destkop with the KDE libraries.
I assume the files are created by ImageMagick as they are under names
like "magick-639773V132v321lubl.pam". I think they are created when
proces
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407948
Bug ID: 407948
Summary: Option to configure temp directory
Product: digikam
Version: 6.2.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397744
Bug ID: 397744
Summary: Face recognition not working
Product: digikam
Version: 6.0.0
Platform: Appimage
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
23 matches
Mail list logo
