https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399473
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch ---
I said SIGTERM, not SIGHUP. Now you wrote like 2 pages of text to at least 3
people before simply trying that out locally ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399473
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399320
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #1 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393091
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch ---
Ok, fair enough.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393091
--- Comment #2 from Sven Brauch ---
It would probably in general make sense if KDevelop would just prepend this
path to the shell environment's path before starting it ... then we could also
remove the kdevelop! executable from our bin/ path, it imo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397734
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395148
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #2 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398281
--- Comment #5 from Sven Brauch ---
KDE Frameworks 5.50 was released a few days ago, the rest depends on your
distribution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398281
--- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch ---
Side note: I think this is actually a "regression" in Qt, not in our
application, which broke this at some point. It's about the default minimum
size for section headers in item views.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398281
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||5.50
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398281
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396661
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch ---
It won't be, this happens deep within a call to ParseTranslationUnit, if you
remove that you basically disable C++ support completely.
Maybe try reporting this to libclang upstream, see what they say ...
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398147
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|git master |unspecified
Assignee|kdevelop-bugs-n
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397170
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397266
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandy.8...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322477
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322477
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392926
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397388
--- Comment #5 from Sven Brauch ---
Debug symbols for KDevelop might help already, maybe ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397388
--- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch ---
Hm, yeah, but unfortunately that doesn't help me reproduce the problem :/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396661
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396917
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397170
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397388
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256561
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Latest Commit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397328
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |INVALID
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397328
--- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch ---
Simply install git, that should be sufficient ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397328
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397045
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #2 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396849
--- Comment #1 from Sven Brauch ---
What linux distro is your package from? It seems like they built it against
Python 3.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396310
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396310
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #1 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396195
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #1 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395856
--- Comment #12 from Sven Brauch ---
The kate developers already agreed on a list of color names they commonly need,
and came up with something like 10-15 colors. We are not going to be able to
add another 15 to these which make sense. And as always
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395856
--- Comment #11 from Sven Brauch ---
I'll put it on my mental "to-discuss-at-akademy"-list. I'm afraid there are a
few things above this priority-wise though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395856
--- Comment #8 from Sven Brauch ---
Because the color scheme manager is provided by the KTextEditor component,
which knows nothing about these colors. If you would add them there, kate users
would have like 15 colors to configure there (it's not so few
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395856
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch ---
I understand your complaint. You are also not the first person who is unhappy
with this. I'm just saying fixing it is (both technically and logically) not as
simple as just adding five entries to a config list
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395856
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch ---
On my screen the attachment looks ok, for my taste.
I think there are two reasons why this is not currently there (not saying it
shouldn't be): a) we do not have an interface to add additional config colors
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395857
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395857
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #1 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395856
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #1 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394105
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.org/kde
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395039
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.org/kat
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395039
--- Comment #9 from Sven Brauch ---
The attached patch fixes it, and makes more sense anyways. I do not understand
why the old variant breaks though, ideas? What is certainly wrong is the
mapToSource call, because it uses a different model
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395039
--- Comment #10 from Sven Brauch ---
Created attachment 113248
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=113248=edit
fix for bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395039
--- Comment #8 from Sven Brauch ---
I think this has to do with the item model changes in Qt 5.11. It's either a
regression in Qt, or more likely wrong usage of the API in kate which worked so
far but is broken now.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395039
--- Comment #7 from Sven Brauch ---
The model seems populated properly, I can see that in Gammaray. Super strange
issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395039
--- Comment #5 from Sven Brauch ---
I downgraded to kate 17.08, which is the oldest kate I have in my cache, and it
quite certainly worked there before ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395039
--- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch ---
It's very strange though. The bug does not disappear again through downgrading
either kate nor ktexteditor. Either it is in some other component, or caused by
some broken config file.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395039
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #2 from Sven
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391518
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Latest Commit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395068
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
Severity|normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388452
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393138
--- Comment #9 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hi, please submit your review requests on phabricator.kde.org. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393138
--- Comment #7 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Yes, you can retrieve the session name from m_model by calling data() with
index 1. See sessioncontroller.cpp, where this model is set up.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393779
--- Comment #31 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
That sounds super terrible to me. Why exactly can there not be an option in
llvm-config which simply prints this path?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393138
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393779
--- Comment #8 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hm. On my system,
> llvm-config --includedir
/usr/include
and
> llvm-config --libdir
/usr/lib
Both is definitely not what we want to put here. I don't know why this re
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393779
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
What is the output of llvm-config --libdir? That is what is used by cmake to
find this directory as far as I can see.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393779
--- Comment #5 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
... CLANG_LIBRARY_DIRS this was meant to read, of course
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393779
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393643
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393604
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393444
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Very strange. I think I did exactly as you described, with one of the files
opened and another not, and all is fine. I have also never seen / heard this
before ...
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393444
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393129
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|kdevelop-bugs-n...@kde.org |kwrite-bugs-n...@k
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392837
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.2.1 |5.44.0
Com
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392837
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||junior-jobs
-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392837
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392602
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392541
--- Comment #1 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Changed the title, because not being able to activate the git plugin without
git actually makes sense.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392541
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unable to active KDE|User-visible fe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392424
--- Comment #8 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Maybe this helps us: try strace -f kdevelop 2>&1| grep encodings
Make sure you have strace installed before.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392424
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
With the AppImage, really? Same assertion?
The error is this:
Could not find platform independent libraries
Could not find platform dependent libraries
Consider setting $PYTH
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392424
--- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Can you look at the console output? This is an assertion, it would be
interesting to know the message.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392336
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368689
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379219
--- Comment #30 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
You can turn off the git plugin in the options, no?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391582
--- Comment #5 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Just looking at the terminal output should tell you which file it tries to
parse, maybe that contains some hint of what's going on? It's strange though, I
often load at least parts of the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391582
--- Comment #2 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Could you try with 5.2.1 from kdevelop.org/download?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391582
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391470
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Ah, it's also possible that it exits because of an assert. Can you post the
console log?
But also, can you please try KDevelop 5.2.1? The version you use is again quite
a while old .
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391470
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388370
--- Comment #7 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hm, we were not aware of Umbrello using KDevPlatform at the time where we
decided to merge the two repos. We were under the impression that nobody was
using it at all. Effectively, this mea
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388370
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388277
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388210
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386388
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387391
--- Comment #21 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Thank you very much for looking into this! Ideally, you could submit your full
patch to phabricator.kde.org, which is our usual platform for reviewing
changes. I am a bit confused by your
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097
--- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
In my eyes this section of the GPL FAQ is relatively questionable. Just because
it's part of the FAQ doesn't mean it's what law will actually do. According to
my recent research about a s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387692
--- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
@neon: can you maybe run the tests, or try to start the application before
shipping it, so we don't have dozens of unhappy users floating around with this
issue after each clang release? I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387692
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373017
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
After a bit of quick looking around, I think one realistic option would be to
read current memory usage from /proc/1234/mem before starting a parse job, and
defer starting t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387391
--- Comment #11 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
I could imagine that this could e.g. depend on whether the parser is invoked
for the open document you modified, or for the document which is listed in the
list of files which ar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387391
--- Comment #8 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Maybe the logic which checks which project a file is part of gets confused by
the symlinks, could that be related?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387391
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386915
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
Hm, we didn't change anything though. Weird.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373017
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbra
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387347
--- Comment #6 from Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> ---
The "can not get property" looks related to me. Unfortunately I'm not at all
familiar with the xdebug protocol, maybe somebody knows about this ...?
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387406
Sven Brauch <m...@svenbrauch.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
201 - 300 of 858 matches
Mail list logo
