https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401742
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401742
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Ah I see now I need to read that with the next line, but the odd line breaking
confused me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399584
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bmkzso...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Tom
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401274
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401274
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Severity|critical
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400829
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|unhandled instruction bytes |vex amd64->IR: unhand
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783
--- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes ---
Look there is basically nothing we can do with the information you have
provided - the stack trace is incomplete because the symbols appear to have
been stripped and you're using an obscure distribution that I doubt
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400782
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
That is lost yes because the only pointer to it is on the stack and once you
exit that pointer is no longer in scope.
You're right it's not strictly necessary to free that but it's a fairly unusual
thing to see
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
The only reference to valgrind in that stack trace is to our replacement free
routine which has detected the problem - the actual problem is in the dynlink.c
code about that which has apparently passed an invalid
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400783
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400782
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392855
--- Comment #11 from Tom Hughes ---
For the record here is the backtrace for the 1024 byte malloc:
#0 __GI___libc_malloc (bytes=1024) at malloc.c:3012
#1 0x77e2e8f0 in __GI__IO_file_doallocate (fp=0x77f7e780
<_IO_2_1_stdo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392855
--- Comment #10 from Tom Hughes ---
I don't believe we have ever attempted to suppress memory allocations done by
the system libraries - you may have been lucky in not seeing any but I don't
believe it has ever been our policy to suppress them
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400119
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396290
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #30 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399087
--- Comment #10 from Tom Hughes ---
The readlink support was introduced in
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=valgrind.git;a=commitdiff;h=423bfef15b2e275314263fea8af11a29d5509110
(later extended to readlinkat) and the NEWS entry in
https
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399087
--- Comment #9 from Tom Hughes ---
Oddly it seems NEWS.old claims that support was added for both open and
readlink in 2.4.0 but I'm not sure that's true, or if it is then I think open
has been lost...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399087
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398545
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes ---
Well the most obvious would be because nobody has submitted an implementation
yet...
If that's an AMD specific instruction then in general I'm not sure we have
anything much in the way of support for those - not sure
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398545
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=398178
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397393
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397012
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||subhranilmukherjee190@gmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396887
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||subhranilmukherjee190@gmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397393
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 396887 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396887
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drankinatty@suddenlinkmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397521
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 396887 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397012
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drankinatty@suddenlinkmail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397521
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388786
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397357
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395682
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396415
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396220
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=396176
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cj-...@zougloub.eu
--- Comment #20 from Tom
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395871
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Summary|unhandled
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381556
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #9 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395434
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395246
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395136
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Summary|Valgrind
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392855
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369030
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369028
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369027
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369030
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
I see no sign that this has been added.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369031
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368960
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369032
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369033
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369026
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369034
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393272
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387940
--- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
As this is your own code the most likely cause is that you have compiled with
-march=native or similar, which is never a good idea when using valgrind as we
are not always up to date with the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387940
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ezy...@mit.edu
--- Comme
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393083
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
Can you please run with --trace-syscalls=yes and paste in the last few lines
leading up to the error?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393083
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|NOT IMPLEMENTED |Unimplemented
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392855
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392146
--- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
I think you were already told on IRC when you asked that it should provide
results which reflect the capabilities of the emulated environment, which in at
least some cases is likely t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
--- Comment #16 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
Were not actually daft you know and I did check the Intel manual multiple
times. To be clear I believe this quote covers it:
"The address-size override prefix (67H) allows programs to swi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
--- Comment #14 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
Not really - the actual bogus instruction was in ld.so which is not part of the
code generated by that compilation.
So you would need to isolate the relevant file in the glibc source a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
--- Comment #12 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
I don't believe anybody has a test case so there wouldn't be any point.
If you can come up some C that will cause the compiler to generate this
sequence then please feel free to report it.
-
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390765
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390498
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=390471
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389470
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@comp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388847
--- Comment #3 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
No that's completely different - that's just valgrind doing it's job and
telling you that your program is passing uninitialised data to a system call.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388847
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388847
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@comp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388706
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Long bunches of warnings: |w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388706
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@comp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388603
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388493
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
To be honest I think here are probably two entirely separate issues. One is the
DWARF parser not handling the subrange tag:
parse DIE(readdwarf3.c:3619): confused by:
<2><17a1ec>:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388493
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388407
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sdel...@sdelang.fr
--- C
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387664
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
--- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
Because we still don't really understand what that instruction means - that
patch is just a best guess at how to decode it.
If that patch is correct then the prefix is redundant in which ca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208052
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@comp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386115
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hartb...@gmail.com
--- C
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385707
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384732
--- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
We already detect CLONE_VFORK|CLONE_VM as a special case and deliberately drop
CLONE_VM because I imagine anything else would be a disaster as valgrind's
shadow memory etc would be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384732
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #107621|0 |1
is ob
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384230
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381815
--- Comment #9 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
Actually that's not the same at all - in fact it's not even a bug (in valgrind)
it's just a normal error report about a bug in your program where it is passing
uninitialised data to a syste
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381819
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@comp
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381815
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381769
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
Atta
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380193
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380037
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
By the way the specific problem you're seeing here is that asan is trying to
make sure it's intercepting malloc etc but of course valgrind also wants to do
the same thing and they can't both
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380037
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379966
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|WARNING: unhandled syscall: |WARNING: unh
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379966
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368507
--- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> ---
Fails at 32Gb without patch:
trying for 31 GB ..
==12078== Warning: set address range perms: large range [0x3960c040,
0x7f960c040) (defined)
.. OK
==12078== Warning: set address range perms:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379537
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@compton.nu
--- Comm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331126
Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
301 - 400 of 487 matches
Mail list logo
