https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488388
--- Comment #10 from Adam Williamson ---
I think there was some debate about that in the GNOME issue(s), which is partly
why I linked there...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488388
Harald Sitter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sit...@kde.org
--- Comment #9 from Harald Sitte
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488388
--- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson ---
actually, I *think*
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/qa/openqa-repos/openqa-testrepo-2/ should fit
the bill, it contains an unsigned package. This repo definition should work:
[openqa-testrepo-2]
name=openQA test
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488388
--- Comment #7 from Nate Graham ---
I don't know how to do that, can you provide instructions?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488388
--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson ---
well, I ran into this testing Fedora side tags, which are designed to be
ephemeral unfortunately. There aren't any permanent ones AFAIK. It should be
relatively easy to just build a dummy RPM package and create a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488388
--- Comment #5 from Nate Graham ---
Adam, could you provide more detailed steps to reproduce, like with an actual
public repository we can test with? That would be useful so we can make sure
any changes do succeed in addressing the issue.
--
You are r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488388
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488388
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DOWNSTREAM |---
Status|RESOLVED
