https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #26 from Uwe Stöhr ---
> I will put this on the TODO list for the next release
Many thanks. I opened bug 394223 as feature request.
> Is it ok to contact you when we think this new feature is working?
Sure. You have already my private mai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #24 from Uwe Stöhr ---
As I wrote in comment 22: "the fitting result are now correct but as long as
LabPlot does not draw the fit curve with the given start parameters, the
problem is not fixed in my opinion."
> does MagicPlot Pro find the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #23 from urcind...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 112528
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=112528&action=edit
Test works OK in Linux
Well, I just sync'ed and compiled labplot again (Gentoo Linux). My results are
identical to tho
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Uwe Stöhr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Uwe Stöhr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|CONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |CONFIRMED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
urcind...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||urcind...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from u
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #16 from Christoph Feck ---
To further investigate this issue, LabPlot developers need the information
requested in comment #14. If you can provide it, or need help with finding that
information, please add a comment.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #15 from Christoph Feck ---
If you can provide the information requested in comment #14, please add it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #13 from Uwe Stöhr ---
Created attachment 110551
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=110551&action=edit
.lml test file
Test file for comment 12
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Uwe Stöhr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #10 from Uwe Stöhr ---
Created attachment 109438
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=109438&action=edit
another test file
with this test file the Recalculate button is always disabled
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #9 from Uwe Stöhr ---
Created attachment 109437
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=109437&action=edit
lml testfile
test project showing the bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Uwe Stöhr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|alexander.se...@web.de |stefan.gerlach@uni-konstanz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #6 from Uwe Stöhr ---
> I could not reproduce the problem. Attached my screenshot of your test case.
> Is there anything i may have missed?
Then this bug was fixed in the meantime. I use the same settings as you and
"0.01" as start value f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
Stefan Gerlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefan.gerlach@uni-konstanz
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #4 from uwesto...@web.de ---
Created attachment 108823
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108823&action=edit
MagicPlot good fit result with a=0.01
I attached is the fit result of MagicPlot using the start parameters a=0.01,
b=1 and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
uwesto...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
--- Comment #3 from uwesto...@web.de --
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #2 from uwesto...@web.de ---
Created attachment 108821
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108821&action=edit
Fit result from MagicPlot
The fit is bad but at least is exists and one can see it. One gets the idea
that setting paramet
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386800
--- Comment #1 from uwesto...@web.de ---
Created attachment 108819
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=108819&action=edit
no fit result and senseless fit parameters
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
27 matches
Mail list logo