https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
--- Comment #12 from Vinícius ---
(In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #11)
> The incorrect "saved state" would also affect whether the Apply button gets
> enabled or disabled. Not exactly intended behavior but the fix explains why
> it would
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
--- Comment #11 from Jakob Petsovits ---
(In reply to Vinícius from comment #10)
> (In reply to Tim from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #1)
> > > Would this be a duplicate of Bug 487745?
> >
> > Yes, I think so. I didn't
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
--- Comment #10 from Vinícius ---
(In reply to Tim from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #1)
> > Would this be a duplicate of Bug 487745?
>
> Yes, I think so. I didn't find that one when searching before reporting.
>
> There
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
Jakob Petsovits changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||viniciusdaros2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
Jakob Petsovits changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||6.1.1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
Jakob Petsovits changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
Tim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://invent.kde.org/plas
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
--- Comment #5 from Tim ---
Yep, it seems that change fixes it and gives the expected behaviour:
```
--- a/kcmodule/profiles/ExternalServiceSettings.cpp
+++ b/kcmodule/profiles/ExternalServiceSettings.cpp
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
--- Comment #4 from Jakob Petsovits ---
(In reply to Tim from comment #3)
> Shouldn't the initial value of the batteryConservationMode be set to the
> value read by the getconservationmode job similar to the line above?
>
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
--- Comment #3 from Tim ---
Shouldn't the initial value of the batteryConservationMode be set to the value
read by the getconservationmode job similar to the line above?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
--- Comment #2 from Tim ---
(In reply to Jakob Petsovits from comment #1)
> Would this be a duplicate of Bug 487745?
Yes, I think so. I didn't find that one when searching before reporting.
There are slight differences in the descriptions; A reboot
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
--- Comment #1 from Jakob Petsovits ---
Would this be a duplicate of Bug 487745?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488954
Jakob Petsovits changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabian.ar...@root-core.net,
14 matches
Mail list logo
