[clazy] [Bug 360374] Check for QString::left(1) mis-use.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360374 Sergio Martins changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[clazy] [Bug 360374] Check for QString::left(1) mis-use.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360374 --- Comment #2 from Volker Krause --- I haven't found a valid use of left(1) yet, so an unconditional warning would probably be fine. In theory it differs from at(0) in that it returns a QString rather than a QChar, which doesn't

[clazy] [Bug 360374] Check for QString::left(1) mis-use.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360374 --- Comment #1 from Sergio Martins --- When shouldn't QString::left(1) be replaced by at(0) ? Wondering if we should just warn for all occurrences. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[clazy] [Bug 360374] Check for QString::left(1) mis-use.

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360374 Sergio Martins changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned-b...@kde.org |smart...@kde.org