[clazy] [Bug 367971] New Q_ENUM check also warns about Q_ENUMS for enums outside a class

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367971 Sergio Martins changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|CONFIRMED

[clazy] [Bug 367971] New Q_ENUM check also warns about Q_ENUMS for enums outside a class

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367971 Sergio Martins changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[clazy] [Bug 367971] New Q_ENUM check also warns about Q_ENUMS for enums outside a class

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367971 Sergio Martins changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned-b...@kde.org |smart...@kde.org -- You are receiving this ma

[clazy] [Bug 367971] New Q_ENUM check also warns about Q_ENUMS for enums outside a class

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367971 --- Comment #1 from Christian Ehrlicher --- Ok, the question is - why someone would add Q_ENUM for a enum defined in a namespace. I currently can't see a reason for it but moc does not complain either ... :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You