[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2023-04-23 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version Fixed In||8.1.0 Resolution|---

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-14 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 --- Comment #12 from Maik Qualmann --- I already wrote that we are using the API to save an Exiv2 "image" in XMP format. We cannot change this behavior, the way Darktable does it is not applicable to digiKam. The problem would have to be discussed

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-13 Thread Michael
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 --- Comment #11 from Michael --- I don't see an example of a sidecar file. I only see an example for embedded XMP data in a JPEG file ("This is an example XML document for serialized XMP metadata in a JPEG photo"). As I wrote before a packet wrapper

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-13 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 --- Comment #10 from Maik Qualmann --- Here is an example of a sidecar file in the Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Platform Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-13 Thread Michael
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 --- Comment #9 from Michael --- I know that ExifTool writes a packet wrapper for sidecar files. But for my understanding of the XMP specification this is not correct. I think the specification should be more relevant than the output of a certain

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-13 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 --- Comment #8 from Maik Qualmann --- You forget that we are writing an Exiv2::Image of type XMP. Yes, it's XML formatted, but the packet wrapper is one of it. The best test is to test it with ExifTool. ExifTool also writes a packet wrapper and not an

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-12 Thread Michael
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 --- Comment #7 from Michael --- Maik, that's not correct in my opinion. A XMP sidecar file should start with a XML header. If Exiv2 doesn't write this header that's IMHO a bug. Please have a look at the XMP specification from Adobe, Part 3, Storage

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-12 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 --- Comment #6 from Maik Qualmann --- If I create a sidecar with "exiv2 -eX image.jpg", the format is identical to digiKam. In addition, we have to use an Exiv2::Image so that Exif and IPTC metadata can also be mapped to XMP via the internal Exiv2

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-12 Thread Maik Qualmann
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 Maik Qualmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||metzping...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Maik

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-12 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Resolution|UPSTREAM

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-12 Thread Michael
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 Michael changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.6.0 |7.2.0 --- Comment #4 from Michael --- (In reply to

[digikam] [Bug 382645] XMP sidecar file should not contain a packet wrapper

2021-04-08 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=382645 caulier.gil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|XMP sidecar file should not |XMP sidecar file should not