https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409990
--- Comment #6 from IWBR ---
Well, the two are not mutually exclusive :)
And I think also having the option in the metadata editor would be more
user-friendly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409990
--- Comment #5 from Maik Qualmann ---
I do not think we would add the function to the metadata editor. Presumably it
would be a plugin for the BQM where fields can be selected from a list of
metadata and then applied to all images.
Maik
--
You are re
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409990
--- Comment #4 from IWBR ---
Sure, no problem. I searched for similar requests before submitting it, but I
must have missed that one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409990
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409990
--- Comment #2 from IWBR ---
Yes, I know, but this would be much more flexible. For instance, you could
change camera model, the exposition time, or the IPTC location for multiple
pictures in a click.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are wa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409990
Maik Qualmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Maik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409990
IWBR changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iwannaber...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail b
