[frameworks-knotifications] [Bug 481068] The power to run a command upon a notification is severely limited by lack of information

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Pete Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pfmil...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mai

[frameworks-knotifications] [Bug 481068] The power to run a command upon a notification is severely limited by lack of information

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 fanzhuyi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b

[frameworks-knotifications] [Bug 481068] The power to run a command upon a notification is severely limited by lack of information

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #2 from Flossy Cat --- My bug report demonstrates there is user request for this feature and the decision is contended: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481069 These solitary declarations of unmaintenance show a lack of respect for lon

[frameworks-knotifications] [Bug 481068] The power to run a command upon a notification is severely limited by lack of information

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #3 from fanzhuyi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Flossy Cat from comment #2) > My bug report demonstrates there is user request for this feature and the > decision is contended: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481069 > > These solitary

[frameworks-knotifications] [Bug 481068] The power to run a command upon a notification is severely limited by lack of information

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 --- Comment #4 from Flossy Cat --- (In reply to fanzhuyifan from comment #3) > How about let's consolidate the discussion on resupporting this in 481069? > (That's why I cc'ed 481069 when I closed this report.) We can always reopen > if we decide to res