[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2024-06-14 Thread Martin Kyral
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 --- Comment #10 from Martin Kyral --- Build of gwenview patched to prefer KDCRaw (Fedora 40 only): https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mkyral/gwenview/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2024-06-11 Thread Martin Kyral
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 --- Comment #9 from Martin Kyral --- After some time I looked at the issue again and got some success: the breakage by the kimageformats update was apparently caused by kimageformats somehow affecting the formatHint value, when I hardcoded the format

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2024-01-13 Thread vylu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 vylu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lukev...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2023-12-12 Thread Martin Kyral
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 --- Comment #8 from Martin Kyral --- Just to have a glimpse: I was extracting the embedded hi-res jpeg image using dcraw -e (the method kdcraw uses as well) from 150 raws from 16mpx Olympus. It took under 500ms. Compare it to the Qt Raw plugin which

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2023-12-04 Thread Martin Kyral
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 --- Comment #7 from Martin Kyral --- (In reply to Martin Kyral from comment #6) > The config option seems perfectly fine to me. Let the user decide that's > best for them. > > The problem is, that KDCraw fucntionality is apparently broken (maybe by >

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2023-11-15 Thread Martin Kyral
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 --- Comment #6 from Martin Kyral --- The config option seems perfectly fine to me. Let the user decide that's best for them. The problem is, that KDCraw fucntionality is apparently broken (maybe by kimageformats 5.99) for quite a while. So, the KDCraw

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2023-11-15 Thread Mirco Miranda
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 Mirco Miranda changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mirco...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Mirco

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2023-11-15 Thread Martin Kyral
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 --- Comment #4 from Martin Kyral --- Another downturn is that while with KDCraw you get the image straight from the camera, with Qt Raw plugin the image looks different, rather dull and underexposed as the demosaicing algorithm and colour science is

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2023-11-15 Thread Martin Kyral
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 --- Comment #3 from Martin Kyral --- By regression I mean the feature is virtually unusable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2023-11-14 Thread Martin Kyral
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 Martin Kyral changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sine.nom...@centrum.cz --- Comment #2 from

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2023-08-16 Thread Andrej Halveland
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 Andrej Halveland changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Version|22.04.1

[gwenview] [Bug 454206] Slow performance with RAW files on big folders

2022-05-22 Thread bugzilla_noreply
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454206 aron...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unusable performance with |Slow performance with RAW