https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388502
emohr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|reproducible, usability |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388502
emohr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|Usability+ |Brainstorm+
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388502
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Feck ---
> The image itself is just a few MB.
On disk? In memory, an image needs 4 bytes per pixel, so if you have
1920x20 pixels, it would already be 1.5 GByte.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388502
fritzib...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fritzib...@gmx.net
Flags|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388502
--- Comment #2 from Tuomo Sipola ---
(In reply to Vincent PINON from comment #1)
> Hello,
> True that our widgets ask for a limit, we believed these would never be
> reached ;)
> Isn't memory consumption jumping too high with very large images?
> I've s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388502
Vincent PINON changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
