[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 Kevin Funk changed: What|Removed |Added Version Fixed In||5.3.0 Resolution|---

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Funk --- @Francis: No, dynamically linking to a LGPLv3-only library has the same effect as copying the code into your application. The resulting work would have to be GPLv3. See:

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 --- Comment #9 from Francis Herne --- We'd be allowed to dynamically link to distro packages of 2.04 (LGPL-3.0), no? It's only because we bundle the code and statically link it that we have this problem. -- You are receiving this

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 Kevin Funk changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 Francis Herne changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@flherne.uk --- Comment

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 --- Comment #6 from Francis Herne --- Astyle upstream changed to an MIT license from 2.06 (changelog http://astyle.sourceforge.net/news.html). That should help. It looks as though most distros package libastyle on its own; does

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 Luigi Toscano changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Giboudeaux --- So you suggest we drop kdevelop from openSUSE ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 --- Comment #3 from Sven Brauch --- In my eyes this section of the GPL FAQ is relatively questionable. Just because it's part of the FAQ doesn't mean it's what law will actually do. According to my recent research about a similar

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 Christophe Giboudeaux changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kf...@kde.org,

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Giboudeaux --- Sorry for the delay, finally got an answer : https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLPlugins https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLAndPlugins Thus, depending on how

[kdevelop] [Bug 368097] Kdevelop5 contains GPL-3.0 files

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368097 --- Comment #1 from Milian Wolff --- This is inside a plugin. Would it be enough to make the plugin GPL 3? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.