https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
--- Comment #9 from Thibault North ---
Thanks for the guidance and fast integration!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
Kevin Funk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||5.2.0
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Funk ---
Thanks T
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.org/kde
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
--- Comment #6 from Thibault North ---
Turns out only the function isValidDirectory() needs fixing.
A request is now available on Phabricator here:
https://phabricator.kde.org/D5014
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug cha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
--- Comment #5 from Thibault North ---
Hu, right, that what happens when one edits the diff... :)
Ok. I'll be off for two weeks, I'll come back to this bug ASAP.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
--- Comment #4 from Sven Brauch ---
Seems a bit strange, first you check whether the file does not exist, then you
open it? ;)
But otherwise looks good, it'd be great if you could test it and put it on
phabricator.kde.org.
Having a development setup is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
--- Comment #3 from Thibault North ---
Thanks for all the pointers.
Since it's not trivial to prepare a dev environment for kdevelop *and* work at
the same time ("You have to remove all KDevelop packages provided by your
distribution"), I wasn't able to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
Sven Brauch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@svenbrauch.de
--- Comment #2 from Sven Brauc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375849
Kevin Funk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|0
