[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2021-01-12 Thread Bug Janitor Service
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 Bug Janitor Service changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED Resolution|UNMAINTAINED

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2020-12-28 Thread Bug Janitor Service
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #23 from Bug Janitor Service --- Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2020-12-14 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 Jasem Mutlaq changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |UNMAINTAINED Status|REOPENED

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-09-01 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #21 from Jasem Mutlaq --- The only place where this happens is in sendNewNumber(...) so it sets the EQNP property to IPS_BUSY. However, processNumber(...) in Align class looks for updates in EQUATORIAL_EOD_COORD (sent by the driver). So this

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-09-01 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 James Lancaster changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-22 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 Jasem Mutlaq changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit|https://commits.kde.org/kst |https://commits.kde.org/kst |a

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-22 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #18 from James Lancaster --- Well, there's at least one instance seen here that I looked at. [2019-08-22T14:00:48.074 CDT INFO ][ org.kde.kstars.indi] - LX200 OnStep : "[INFO] OnStep: Synchronization successful. " [2019-08-22T1

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-22 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #17 from James Lancaster --- Created attachment 122295 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=122295&action=edit Kstars log after patch using CCD simulator -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-22 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #16 from James Lancaster --- I have had some troubles and the one (real sky) test I did have (where I also put a timer in) worked, but had other issues, so I'll attempt to sim it again, shortly. Did you want wireshark or just kstars logs?

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-19 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #15 from Jasem Mutlaq --- Did you have a chance to test this? I included this patch in KStars by mistake as well. So if you just compile from git, you can test it out right away. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-12 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #14 from Jasem Mutlaq --- Created attachment 122087 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=122087&action=edit align debug patch I don't think we should opt for the hack-workaround just yet. Can you please apply this patch and share th

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-12 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #13 from James Lancaster --- So different periods do affect how often it gets triggered. However, when I tried set at down at 100ms (really more like 200-250ish) and locally 17/25 instances encounter it. If it's at 1 second, maybe 1/10 do.

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-07 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #12 from Jasem Mutlaq --- Ok I'm not sure... Is the driver update period 250ms? I see 4 IPS_BUSYs in 1 second. If that is the case, just try to make the period 1 second and see if that makes any difference? -- You are receiving this mail

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-07 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #11 from James Lancaster --- That case the Idle > OK is because of me turning tracking on. Then the mount model starts slewing it. Ok > Busy (Seen in packet 16405) :Te# sent (Tracking Enable) -- You are receiving this mail because: You ar

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-06 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #10 from Jasem Mutlaq --- Thanks for the logs! Do you know why in #16483 the state was set to Ok? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-06 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #9 from James Lancaster --- Created attachment 121980 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=121980&action=edit kstars log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-06 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #7 from James Lancaster --- Realized something just before posting this, make sure you read to at least the note I apparently didn't save the wireshark log, but I was able to reproduce it. Attaching it with large packets removed, and

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-06 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #8 from James Lancaster --- Created attachment 121979 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=121979&action=edit Wireshark Log Log with ignoring packets above 1 bytes (as it's using the CCD simulator and it ballons the size, even g

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-04 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #6 from Jasem Mutlaq --- Thanks for the detailed report! This should win the trophy for the most _detailed_ bug report yet! However, the attachments are missing and I need to put the two logs (wireshark + kstars) next to each other to get a

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-04 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #5 from James Lancaster --- Adding a couple more, it seems much more rare, but it still seems to happen, I added more print statements, and ended up with this, didn't get a wireshark capture, but this seems just odd. Chronoloical order is

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-04 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #4 from James Lancaster --- The settle timer operates from when it thinks the end of a slew is and is up to 15 seconds long, whereas slews (especially meridian flips) might be minutes. I went back to the version in git, rebuilt kstars. Als

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-03 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 --- Comment #3 from Jasem Mutlaq --- There is already a settle timer, so I don't think adding another timer is the right approach. There is a problem with the state transition.. so what is causing that? some race condition? driver issue perhaps? -- Yo

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-08-03 Thread James Lancaster
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 James Lancaster changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[kstars] [Bug 410094] Kstars sometimes fails to wait for a slew to happen before slew is regarded as complete on the mount tool.

2019-07-22 Thread Jasem Mutlaq
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410094 Jasem Mutlaq changed: What|Removed |Added Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.org/kst |