https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
William Kendrick changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@sonic.net
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #44 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
Here's a feature request for wayland:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459034.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Vlad Zahorodnii changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilk...@gmail.com
--- Comment #43 from Vlad Za
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@laxu.de
--- Comment #42 from Nate Graham --
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #41 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #40)
> >Do I need to open a new one?
>
> Yeah.
Done: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457487
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug ch
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #40 from David Edmundson ---
>Do I need to open a new one?
Yeah.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #39 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
Why is it not possible to reopen bugs?
Do I need to open a new one?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #38 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
Created attachment 150847
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=150847&action=edit
Shaded windows after a forceful kwin restart with kwin_x11 --replace.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #37 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
Hi Vlad, unfortunately I have to report, that your fix doesn't fully fix this
issue.
In order to reproduce, please shade some windows, and restart: kwin_x11
--replace.
The result here is, that windows a redu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version Fixed In||5.25.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #36 from Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Jansen from comment #35)
> Of course, we also need to take session management into account.
Not being one that uses session management (per se, I use startup scripts and
wind
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #35 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
@Duncan: nice sum up.
Of course, we also need to take session management into account. The X11
protocol does provide the shaded flag for this task.
I even hacked a related tool to handle my firefox setup. FF f
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #34 from Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Jansen from comment #33)
> As a reminder: as far as I know, the Wayland protocol has no such concept of
> shaded/shuttered windows. Therefore, preserving this feature in the l
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #33 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
@Audience: offensive language does not help anyone here. It only leads to
worsening the situation as non-technical aspects come to the fore.
Hi Vlad,
> However, given how buggy window shading is and how diff
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #32 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
Can we please refrain from personal attack and stay calm, even if we are
enthusiastic about that feature, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #31 from Bodo Eggert <7egg...@gmx.de> ---
> However, given how buggy window shading is and how difficult it is to
> make it work right, I think that it's better to deprecate window shading
> and remove it in some future release.
> (cherry pic
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #30 from Roberto Ragusa ---
> However, given how buggy window shading is and how difficult it is to
> make it work right, I think that it's better to deprecate window shading
> and remove it in some future release.
Please don't.
These are t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
matthew...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew...@gmail.com
--- Comment #29 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #28 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
Hi Vlad,
I hereby confirm, that your commit fixed the issue in the first tests (I built
kwin as of 61b1eac5b against 5.25.3 here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:frispete:Tumbleweed:testing/kwin5)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #27 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
(In reply to Vlad Zahorodnii from comment #25)
Hi, thank you a lot for the fix, however,
> However, given how buggy window shading is and how difficult it is to
> make it work right, I think that it's better
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #26 from Rob ---
> However, given how buggy window shading is and how difficult it is to
> make it work right, I think that it's better to deprecate window shading
> and remove it in some future release.
Please do not do this.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Vlad Zahorodnii changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit|https://invent.kde.org/plas |https://invent.kde.org/plas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Vlad Zahorodnii changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #23 from Bug Janitor
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Steve Vialle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stev...@orcon.net.nz
--- Comment #22 from Steve
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juan.brea...@gmail.com
--- Comment #21 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Bodo Eggert <7egg...@gmx.de> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||7egg...@gmx.de
--- Comment #20 fr
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
robert.burc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||robert.burc...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|HI |VHI
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #18 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
Created attachment 149930
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=149930&action=edit
Revert forward ported to 5.25.0 makes window shutter usable again with current
kwin
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Jaap Geurts changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jaap.geu...@fontys.nl
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
Priority|NOR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Thomas Otto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.o...@pdv-fs.de
--- Comment #17 from Thomas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Roberto Ragusa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kdebugs-4250@robertoragusa.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Hans-Peter Jansen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlad.zahorod...@kde.org
--- Comment #15 fro
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #14 from Christian (Fuchs) ---
It would be really nice if we could get that revert into a release, unless that
breaks other things. Because right now as is, shade is still broken in both
released versions, the upcoming 5.25 release and on ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
Created attachment 149316
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=149316&action=edit
Attach revert for reference
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
> Can anyone confirm whether shade is /supposed/ to work on wayland?
I think, this is a valid request, and I would be interested to get an answer as
well (even, if deviating from the original issue).
At the w
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Jeff Hayes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeff.haye...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Steven R. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stevenrosensh...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #11 from Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> ---
(In reply to Duncan from comment #6)
> on wayland shade seems to be a disabled option in the window menu ATM??
Can anyone confirm whether shade is /supposed/ to work on wayland?
Presumably it would
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
cn...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cn...@gmx.de
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Grósz Dániel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||groszdaniel...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #8)
> 733469d4e7648cd1df0862c8879ac364594935da is a probable candidate
That nailed it, David.
I have reverted that commit
(0001-Revert-Avoid-mixing-current-and-next-s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Jansen ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #8)
> 733469d4e7648cd1df0862c8879ac364594935da is a probable candidate
Thanks for the hint, David.
I reverted this commit in a 5.24.2 build, but an attempt to reproduc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
David Edmundson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
David Redondo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@fuchsnet.ch
--- Comment #7 from David Redo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450582
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||1i5t5.dun...@cox.net
50 matches
Mail list logo
