https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #30 from Luigi Toscano ---
Also Fedora ships newer Ghostscript versions (9.22 in F27, 9.23 in F28).
Ghostscript in the past had a mixed development model with commercial versions
released before the FLOSS ones, then they changed a bit, and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #28 from Ian Newton ---
Created attachment 113058
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=113058&action=edit
Print preview of PDF file which previously failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #27 from Ian Newton ---
Great your analysis was spot on!
Compiling again to get the libgs.so.9.23 file allowed me to manually replace
the libgs.so.9.21 file and sym-links libgs.so and libgs.so.9 in /usr/lib64 on
my system. This worked strai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #26 from Michael Weghorn ---
I actually do get similar error messages when using Ghostscript 9.21 instead of
9.22, but it works fine with version 9.22 in my case.
libspectre itself uses Ghostscript, or to be more precise, the Ghostscript
li
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #25 from Ian Newton ---
My distribution is currently on gs 9.21 so I have located and compiled from
source gs 9.23
$ gs -v
GPL Ghostscript 9.23 (2018-03-21)
Copyright (C) 2018 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved.
Unfortunately this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #24 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to Ian Newton from comment #23)
> These are the current versions
> libspectre 0.2.8 (January 06, 2017)
> ghostscript 9.21 (May 19, 2018)
I can't reproduce the described bug with the versions that are c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #23 from Ian Newton ---
These are the current versions
libspectre 0.2.8 (January 06, 2017)
ghostscript 9.21 (May 19, 2018)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #22 from Michael Weghorn ---
Good that the avahi issue is solved now.
What versions of libspectre and ghostscript do you have?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #21 from Ian Newton ---
Resolved the avahi-daemon failure as in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050201
"I had some stale files in /var/run/avahi-daemon, cleaning those out seems to
have fixed it"
However the Journal output to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #20 from Ian Newton ---
There may be something here in the output from the command line. Once the print
preview is requested we get:
Settings::instance called after the first use - ignoring
invalidfont -10
invalidfont -10
org.kde.okular.gen
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #19 from Michael Weghorn ---
This sounds a bit similar to bug 385456. Is there any useful output when
starting Okular from the command line?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #18 from Ian Newton ---
As above the journal output when launching print preview and the missing
symlink for launching avahi-daemon results in a second attempt to launch the
daemon. I'll keep this symlink as the result is tidier
May 20 10:0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #17 from Ian Newton ---
Created attachment 112761
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=112761&action=edit
Epson WF2530 ppd file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #16 from Ian Newton ---
Returning to this problem I have checked if this is specific to the Printer
driver WF-2530 Series, Epson Inkjet Printer Driver (ESC/P-R) for Linux () the
same result of 0 pages and no preview content occurs if I selec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
--- Comment #14 from Mich
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #13 from Ian Newton ---
Checked the gs on my system which is 9.20 the init file has the mod suggested
in the gs issue. Is there some debug I can get to tell us what is going on? The
current journal output may not give the detail needed?
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #11 from Ian Newton ---
OK the pdfprintpdf branch seems to make no difference. Builds as v1.0.7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #10 from Ian Newton ---
Building branch pdfprintpdf to see what that does?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #9 from Ian Newton ---
Created attachment 104687
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104687&action=edit
Another file which will not print
I have just built from Git repo and now have v1.1.7 in place of 1.0.3 however
this does not r
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #8 from Oliver Sander ---
BTW, printing still involves conversion to postscript and a call to gs, so your
problem may be in that direction. Looking at the intermediate files may be
interesting, but I do not know how to do that.
There still
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver.san...@tu-dresden.de
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #6 from Ian Newton ---
All files I have tried open and print as expected with LibreOffice Draw. The
print dialogue displays a scaled view of the document. Is this dialogue
available to Okular or is it part of LibreOffice? It may be a good pl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #5 from Ian Newton ---
DM200_UM_EN.pdf is the original and DM200_UM_EN_3.pdf is the re-saved version
from Libre Office
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDSINFO
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Christoph Feck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #104598|application/octet-stream|application/zip
mime type|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #3 from Ian Newton ---
Not all PDFs are affected so I guess it depends on how images are included in
the PDF. It seems 50% of PDFs I have downloaded recently. It may be significant
that these are from sites which generate PDFs on demand like
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
--- Comment #2 from Ian Newton ---
Created attachment 104598
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=104598&action=edit
Original plus re-rendered pdf from Libreoffice Draw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377688
Luigi Toscano changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it
--- Comment #1 from Lu
31 matches
Mail list logo
