https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
--- Comment #11 from Albert Astals Cid ---
Honestly i don't see the point, you all have very corner case use cases and
want a generalistic tool to behave like you would like it.
Anyhow, if you can provide a set of patches (together with autotests)
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
--- Comment #10 from Albert Astals Cid ---
> A second point: if the annotations are not stored in the metadata anymore
> even in the .okular - archive, then what is still the purpose of the .okular
> archive?
Saving the annotations for formats that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
lwkie...@sharklasers.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lwkie...@sharklasers.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
--- Comment #8 from ederag ---
The okular developers have done a great job in general,
so the following is just an idea, not prying at all.
Here is a possible design that would clarify saving with annotations,
while bringing back the great external
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
Sebastian Guttenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wurscht...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Feck ---
Albert, does comment #2 provide the requested information? Please add a comment
or change the bug status.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
--- Comment #4 from ederag ---
Done, here is the downgraded package, for openSUSE Leap15.0:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:ederag/okular-1.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
--- Comment #3 from ederag ---
Another use case:
An email with administrative instructions attached as pdf.
With the previous version, it was possible to highlight the important parts,
now it has to be written back in the mail, which is risky,
and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
--- Comment #2 from ederag ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #1)
> Why would the user care that in that .okular file the pdf is not the
> original one?
This will be explained in point 1) below.
> Moreover, do we promise that in the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397097
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
11 matches
Mail list logo
