https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401329
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401329
--- Comment #7 from Thiago Sueto ---
Hello, after watching the Akademy Consistency talk and seeing this bug report
in retrospect I think it is fine the way it is.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401329
--- Comment #6 from Nate Graham ---
(In reply to David Hurka from comment #5)
> Maybe the answer will be: "I always read
> PDFs top->down, so the first offered option should be 'Search Top-Down', no
> matter which other options exist.".
That makes a
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401329
--- Comment #5 from David Hurka ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #2)
> Not all KDE apps use this layout; Konsole for example has Previous before
> Next.
Not really, the buttons change when you deselect "Search Backwards".
Konversation does it
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401329
--- Comment #4 from Nate Graham ---
The number of people who have complained is not always a valid metric. The real
question is whether or not the proposal is genuinely better; sometimes all it
takes is one person to alert you to that.
Consistency
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401329
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
--- Comment #3 from Albert
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401329
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org
--- Comment #2 from Nate Graham
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401329
--- Comment #1 from David Hurka ---
This layout is the same as in most other KDE applications, and I think it's
fine.
I personally can't imagine whether another order is easier to understand. A
simple test might be invoking okular with "okular
