https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
--- Comment #7 from Bug Janitor Service ---
Dear Bug Submitter,
This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least
15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
--- Comment #5 from Nate Graham ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #4)
> (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3)
> > Can they be legitimately used for any purpose?
>
> Most probably not.
In that case, for such PDFs, I would say we
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
--- Comment #4 from Albert Astals Cid ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3)
> Not an expert on this stuff so let me ask some questions:
>
> - What exactly do you mean by "shitty broken signatures?"
Lots of fields are missing.
> - Are shitty
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
--- Comment #3 from Nate Graham ---
Not an expert on this stuff so let me ask some questions:
- What exactly do you mean by "shitty broken signatures?"
- Are shitty broken signatures valid? Can they be legitimately used for any
purpose?
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
Oliver Sander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
--- Comment #2 from Oliver Sander ---
Okay, so not a bug. But can we improve the text somehow to make it clearer
that the signatures are shitty broken? "This document is signed" sounds too
positive. Unfortunately, not being a signature or usability
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269
Albert Astals Cid changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aa...@kde.org
--- Comment #1 from Albert
