https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #15 from Nate Graham ---
If we move ahead with this, 1 and 2 are fine. 1 is more technically correct,
but probably a bit trickier to implement properly. Personally I'm fine with
adding an option for it.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #14 from Mihai Sorin Dobrescu ---
Back to the issue, reading and learning to be able to solve it, while waiting
to move to 6.
What would be the best solution out of the following:
1. Enable/disable WallpaperFader component completely
2. Set
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #13 from Mihai Sorin Dobrescu ---
Also Window Decorations seems suitable, with regards to loading of a config
dialog directly on the KCM page, in order to blend the already implemented
pages of the SDDM themes settings.
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #12 from Mihai Sorin Dobrescu ---
Pursuing Application Styles, there is a suitable StyleConfigDialog that worth
reusing for this, as placeholder for the actual config dialog. If so, where
would this be placed as a common component?
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #11 from Mihai Sorin Dobrescu ---
Application Styles and Window Decorations are two different implementations. I
see Window Decorations uses DecorationBridge where:
//
// W A R N I N G
// -
//
// This file is not part of the K
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #10 from Nate Graham ---
I think your idea makes sense. It's what we do for Application Styles and
Window Decorations.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #9 from Mihai Sorin Dobrescu ---
Thinking of it, the most natural way would be to add an icon (action icon)
along with the others for details and background, visible when custom settings
are present, to access a setup control specific to the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #8 from Nate Graham ---
Since the feature to be made optional is specific to just the Breeze themes, it
would ideally be shown in a location that makes it clear that it applies only
when using that theme. The Lock and Login screen KCMs would
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #7 from Mihai Sorin Dobrescu ---
Hi, what would be the accepted solution from the UI methodology point of view?
I mean, adding a setting is easy, but how should this be handled by the user?
This blur effect may not a standard part of any SDD
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
Mihai Sorin Dobrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msdobre...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
Raphaël Jakse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raphael@jakse.fr
--- Comment #5 from Raphaë
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #4 from hugh ---
Happy to test for FOSS projects, report issues, follow up afterwards.
As I said, I don't develop. By choice. I hate coding. Tried it. Detest it.
Life is too short to do stuff you hate. Not happening. Ever.
Trawling t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #3 from Nate Graham ---
Well, everything is always harder than it seems. :)
Regardless, you may not think of yourself as a developer, but you can clearly
think logically and read and interpret source code. That's 90% of the way
there! It's
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
--- Comment #2 from hugh ---
I am not a developer.
One property setting change in two locations and an additional UI checkbox is
too much?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455757
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Please allow WallpaperFader |Please allow WallpaperFader
|to
16 matches
Mail list logo
