[rust-qt-binding-generator] [Bug 392959] Invalid QString conversion in TreeModel.data.fieldname

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392959 --- Comment #1 from kdebuac@porcupinefactory.org --- Created attachment 111974 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=111974&action=edit Workaround This works around the issue, and fixes failing test cases. Untested with rustByValue. -- You

[rust-qt-binding-generator] [Bug 392959] Invalid QString conversion in TreeModel.data.fieldname

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392959 --- Comment #2 from kdebuac@porcupinefactory.org --- I'm not sure if the patch is actually the right place to tackle this problem. I would try to fix the behaviour of "rustByValue", but the way it's used seems opposite to me and I dare not touch it:

[rust-qt-binding-generator] [Bug 392959] Invalid QString conversion in TreeModel.data.fieldname

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392959 Jos van den Oever changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[rust-qt-binding-generator] [Bug 392959] Invalid QString conversion in TreeModel.data.fieldname

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392959 --- Comment #1 from kdebuac@porcupinefactory.org --- Created attachment 111974 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=111974&action=edit Workaround This works around the issue, and fixes failing test cases. Untested with rustByValue. -- You

[rust-qt-binding-generator] [Bug 392959] Invalid QString conversion in TreeModel.data.fieldname

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392959 --- Comment #2 from kdebuac@porcupinefactory.org --- I'm not sure if the patch is actually the right place to tackle this problem. I would try to fix the behaviour of "rustByValue", but the way it's used seems opposite to me and I dare not touch it:

[rust-qt-binding-generator] [Bug 392959] Invalid QString conversion in TreeModel.data.fieldname

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392959 Jos van den Oever changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---