https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433345
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|katyaberezy...@gmail.com|
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are wa
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433345
--- Comment #5 from Chandradeep Dey ---
Oh, I did not even know that there are ways other than the XML files to
configure fontconfig.
I did see the fontconfig developers reference, but I assumed that those were
the internal functions fontconfig used to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433345
--- Comment #4 from Harald Sitter ---
All of these were examples. Think of Fedora instead of Arch and GDM instead of
SDDM if you will. The point holds though. If Arch wants a Plasma system to have
Plasma UX then the plasma config would simply have to ou
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433345
--- Comment #3 from Chandradeep Dey ---
Sorry, I meant a basic Arch install with Plasma and noto-fonts as the provider
for ttf-font (multiple fonts provide the virtual package and none of them
conflict with each other).
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433345
--- Comment #2 from Chandradeep Dey ---
> Dumping random settings
There is already the GTK daemon that overwrites all GTK settings. A similar one
can be added for fontconfig. Also, I just noticed that fontconfig looks at
$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/fontconfig/conf
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433345
--- Comment #1 from Harald Sitter ---
I mused on this with Sebastian Kuegler years ago but nothing ever came of it,
and I have been thinking about it every once in a while ever since.
I really don't think us dumping random settings is the way to go. In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433345
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org,
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433345
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com
--
You are receiving th
